[U-Boot] u-boot: x86: interrupt mapping

[Jian Luo <Jian.Luo4@boschrexroth.de>]

Hi Christian,

On 20.07.2016 10:22, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> Hi Jian,
>
>> I took some time to recall what I did by patching FSP:
>>
>> - search in every PE32 and TE image section for binary sequence
>> 81c9000100008908c6460e01
>> and change to
>> 81c9000102008908c6460e00
>>
> In the meantime I started by patching out every access to the uart bar, with
> the same result as I get with your patching strategy.
>
>> - then replace them in-place
>>
> So here is the next interesting problem. During fsp_init it looks like
> fsp copies itself
> to ram (IP 0xFFFD1C6C vs 0x3F5F64E1) and here it does a busy loop :(
I don't think it's a busy loop. This Bug?:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/446555/

>
> At what place do you do the in-place patching? I hoped to do it at
> init_board setup.
I mean in UEFITool select the "PE32 image section", right click "Extract 
body", do binary patching using your favorite hex editor, right click 
"Replace body".
>> The difference can be better understand if disassemblies are compared, eg:
>>   Disassembly of section .data:
>> @@ -3367,9 +3367,9 @@
>>       25fc:    05 00 05 00 00           add    $0x500,%eax
>>       2601:    8b 08                    mov    (%eax),%ecx
>>       2603:    81 e1 ff ff f8 ff        and    $0xfff8ffff,%ecx
>> -    2609:    81 c9 00 01 00 00        or     $0x100,%ecx
>> +    2609:    81 c9 00 01 02 00        or     $0x20100,%ecx
>> What I did here is setting BAUDSEL to SYS_25MHz.
>>
>>       260f:    89 08                    mov    %ecx,(%eax)
>> -    2611:    c6 46 0e 01              movb   $0x1,0xe(%esi)
>> +    2611:    c6 46 0e 00              movb   $0x0,0xe(%esi)
>> Can't recall why I did this, maybe bypassing PLL altogether?
>>
>>       2615:    c6 46 0f 00              movb   $0x0,0xf(%esi)
>>       2619:    c6 46 03 83              movb   $0x83,0x3(%esi)
>>       261d:    c6 46 01 00              movb   $0x0,0x1(%esi)
>>
>> Since I don't rely on Topcliff UART for output, the baud rate recalculation
>> is all skipped.
>>
> The same here... I am using a pci fpga based uart.
Maybe you can try the fsp.bin I sent, to see if it runs
>
Since it's a bit off-topic, should we exchange information w/o ccing the 
list?

Best regards,

*Jian Luo
DC-IA/EAH2*

Tel.  +49(9352)18-4266

*Be**QIK
*