[U-Boot] confused by "upgrade_available=0\0" in include/configs/taurus.h

[Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>]

Hello Robert,

sorry for replying late, but I was on vacation ... and as I got
while I was on vacation!, a new Internetconnection my current
Internetaccess state is unstable, incl. loosing EMails, because
my provider disabled my EMail address (seems currently already
re-enabled ... so sorry, if I not respond to EMails here on this
list)

Am 25.07.2016 um 12:03 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear Robert,
>>
>> In message <alpine.LFD.2.20.1607230737010.12216@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>>
>>>     3094                 CONFIG_AT91SAM9XE
>>>     3095                 enable special bootcounter support on at91sam9xe based boards.
>>>     3096                 CONFIG_BLACKFIN
>>>     3097                 enable special bootcounter support on blackfin based boards.
>>>     3098                 CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX
>>>     3099                 enable special bootcounter support on da850 based boards.
>>
>> This is name space pollution t best, and has potential to cause
>> unwanted side effects.  This needs thorough checking and cleanup, if
>> it should turn out thatthese macros are used only to select specific
>> bootcount implementations - in that case, they should be renamed
>> into something like CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_* or such.
>>
>> Heiko, maybe you could have a look at that, please?
>
>    i'm not sure it's as bad as it looks, since those macros are used
> specifically in drivers/bootcount/Makefile:
>
>    obj-y                           += bootcount.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_AT91SAM9XE)        += bootcount_at91.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLACKFIN)          += bootcount_blackfin.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX)         += bootcount_davinci.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_AM33XX)  += bootcount_davinci.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_RAM)     += bootcount_ram.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_ENV)     += bootcount_env.o
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_I2C)     += bootcount_i2c.o
>
> and drivers/bootcount/ is processed only if:
>
>    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_LIMIT) += bootcount/

Yes, excatly.

>
> but i do see the single, more precise example of
> CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_AM33XX, so someone else can decide if anything
> should be renamed here.

I think the

 >    obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX)         += bootcount_davinci.o
 >    obj-$(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_AM33XX)  += bootcount_davinci.o

part, should be renamed into "CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_DAVINCI" ... and
may all symbols should start with "CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_*" ...

Can you proide a patch for this?

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany