From: Hannes Schmelzer <hannes@schmelzer.or.at>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] cmd/sf: probe flash with speed of last known flash or speed from devicetree
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:21:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BD9132.7030408@schmelzer.or.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <196cb9a1-b5d9-f1bb-1d5a-ac2dfd2fe3a0@ti.com>
On 08/24/2016 01:12 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 24 August 2016 04:21 PM, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
>> On 08/24/2016 12:35 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi Vignesh,
>>> On Wednesday 24 August 2016 03:35 PM, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
>>>> During probing flashes on the spi bus using the "sf probe" command, a
>>>> maybe existing flash (from fdt) is unbound and removed to force the
>>>> 'spi_flash_probe_bus_cs' really scanning the bus.
>>>>
>>>> Today the bus is probed with speed 0, this triggers several fall-back
>>>> mechanism (mostly in the low-level drivers) to catch the impossible zero
>>>> speed.
>>>> Result of this is, that the spi-flash runs at very low speed depending
>>>> on the minimum given by low-level driver/hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Values like 'spi-max-frequency' from devicetree are ignored totally
>>>> today.
>>>>
>>>> This commit changes as following:
>>>> - if there was already some flash binding in devicetree (having some
>>>> spi-max-frequency within) speed is taken from it
>>>> - if no flash binding was present for speed the 'spi-max-frequency' from
>>>> the responsible spi node is taken.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Schmelzer <oe5hpm@oevsv.at>
>>> With commit 96907c0fe50a8 ("dm: spi: Read default speed and mode values
>>> from DT") sf probe picks spi-max-frequency from DT if not specified as
>>> argument.
>>>
>>> But when sf probe is called second time, the command fails to pick up
>>> speed from DT. This is because flash node is unbound from the SPI
>>> controller children nodes. Below patch should fix this issue:
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/659979/
>> sry ... i didn't took notice about this patch at the beginning of mine.
>> Just reviewed and tested it.
>>
>> The named patch makes things a bit better but not good.
>> Speed for flash still has no relationship to 'spi-max-frequency' from
>> the spi-bus nor with a maybe defined flash in dts.
>>
>> Rather the #define CONFIG_ENV_SPI_MAX_HZ is used.
>>
> sf probe calls do_spi_flash_probe()
> -spi_flash_probe_bus_cs()
> -spi_get_bus_and_cs()
>
> In spi_get_bus_and_cs():
> if (!speed) {
> speed = plat->max_hz;
> mode = plat->mode;
> }
> This should set speed to spi-max-frequency as per flash DT node.
yes that should do.
But have look a few lines up, around 296, there the newly created flash
node has been modified with wrong values before.
No glue why a new flash node is being created.
> AFAIU, saveenv() uses CONFIG_ENV_SPI_MAX_HZ only when
> CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH is not defined. Could please explain how
> CONFIG_ENV_SPI_MAX_HZ takes precedence over spi-max-frequency during sf
> probe?
Thanks the discussion, I think we coming closer to the problem.
Your'e right saveenv() behaves as you described, but not so
env_relocate_spec().
There the flash is probed like this:
env_flash = spi_flash_probe(CONFIG_ENV_SPI_BUS, CONFIG_ENV_SPI_CS,
CONFIG_ENV_SPI_MAX_HZ, CONFIG_ENV_SPI_MODE);
and thats the point where some existing dt node becomes modified with
those values. Thats probably wrong doing so.
I think there should be same logic applied as in saveen().
Just for testing i fixed the probe there.
Now i'm a bit confused about that the function spi_find_chip_select(bus,
cs, &dev) in spi-uclass doesn't find child devices on the spi node.
Instead there a new flash binding is created.
spi_get_bus_and_cs: Binding new device 'spi_flash at 0:0', busnum=0, cs=0,
driver=spi_flash_std
my devicetree look like this:
=> fdt print spi0
spi at e000d000 {
clock-names = "ref_clk", "pclk";
clocks = <0x00000001 0x0000000a 0x00000001 0x0000002b>;
compatible = "xlnx,zynq-qspi-1.0";
status = "okay";
interrupt-parent = <0x00000003>;
interrupts = <0x00000000 0x00000013 0x00000004>;
reg = <0xe000d000 0x00001000>;
#address-cells = <0x00000001>;
#size-cells = <0x00000000>;
u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
spi-max-frequency = <0x05f5e100>;
S25FL256S at 0 {
#address-cells = <0x00000001>;
#size-cells = <0x00000001>;
compatible = "spansion,S25FL256S";
reg = <0x00000000>;
spi-max-frequency = <0x05f5e100>;
};
};
=>
cheers,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-24 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-24 10:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] cmd/sf: probe flash with speed of last known flash or speed from devicetree Hannes Schmelzer
2016-08-24 10:35 ` Vignesh R
2016-08-24 10:51 ` Hannes Schmelzer
2016-08-24 11:12 ` Vignesh R
2016-08-24 12:21 ` Hannes Schmelzer [this message]
2016-08-24 14:10 ` Hannes Schmelzer
2016-08-25 8:39 ` Vignesh R
2016-08-25 9:32 ` Hannes Schmelzer
2016-08-25 10:10 ` Vignesh R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57BD9132.7030408@schmelzer.or.at \
--to=hannes@schmelzer.or.at \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox