From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:41:34 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce kconfig for UBI In-Reply-To: <20160920150221.GV29602@bill-the-cat> References: <1473829386-374-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> <569ce190-4053-9af0-7664-d73f01289bac@ti.com> <57E0CE2E.70900@denx.de> <0492d23b-6d21-f0de-af51-897b68d91e29@ti.com> <20160920150221.GV29602@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <57E21D8E.100@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Andrew, Am 20.09.2016 um 17:02 schrieb Tom Rini: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:26:15AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> On 09/20/2016 12:50 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Hello Andrew, >>> >>> Am 19.09.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Andrew F. Davis: >>>> BTW, the following addresses that bounce should be removed from wherever >>>> you found them or added to .get_maintainer.ignore if they are part of >>>> old commits: >>>> >>>> Bo Shen >>>> Albert ARIBAUD >>>> Gerald Kerma >>>> Karl Beldan >>>> Vaibhav Hiremath >>>> Sudhakar Rajashekhara >>>> >>> >>> Hmm.. I used patman for creating the patch and so patman created with >>> the help of scripts/get_maintainer.pl creates the cc list ... >>> >> >> It seems most of these are from MAINTAINER files, these names need to be >> removed and their subsystem status changed to unmaintained until new >> maintainers can step up. >> >>> I just tried to create such a ".get_maintainer.ignore" file, but >>> doesn;t work ... ah, I see, the get_maintainer.pl from U-Boot does >>> not support the ".get_maintainer.ignore" file >>> >>> Hmm.. looked into it, not easy (for me) to fix this "fast" ... >>> >> >> Looks like the scripts/get_maintainer.pl needs to be synced with the >> Linux version, something like: >> >> --- >> >> From b9a032c6e33cfe59f9d2cd6d0901bf588aad3b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: "Andrew F. Davis" >> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:59:58 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Sync with latest version from Linux > > Yes, a re-sync with special attention paid to the few intentional > differences is once again in order :) Please submit as a formal patch > after checking that we didn't lose those (I think it's an easy one and > checkpatch.pl is where it's a tiny bit harder, we never finished > convincing upstream to take one change we had, iirc). Yes, that would be great, just tried your patch proposal, it seems to work :-) Please add also in your commit description, the linux commit ID, which is your base, thanks! bye, Heeiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany