From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Graf Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:54:02 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 02/10] Makefile: use "arm64" architecture for U-Boot image files In-Reply-To: <1478137001-847-3-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <1478137001-847-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1478137001-847-3-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <581AFB2A.80807@suse.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 11/03/2016 02:36 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > At the moment we use the arch/arm directory for arm64 boards as well, > so the Makefile will pick up the "arm" name for the architecture to use > for tagging binaries in U-Boot image files. > Differentiate between the two by looking at the CPU variable being defined > to "armv8", and use the arm64 architecture name on creating the image > file if that matches. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara Why is this important? To know the state you have to be in for SPL->U-Boot transition later? Why didn't anyone else stumble over this yet? Because nobody's using SPL? Alex