From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] drivers, usb, gadget: fix compiler warnings for at91_udc.c
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:31:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <594D1837.2020305@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170623145004.42b91e3f@jawa>
Hello Lukasz,
Am 23.06.2017 um 14:50 schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> Hi Heiko,
>
>> fix warnings:
>> drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c:1344:12: warning: 'at91rm9200_udc_init'
>> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c:1379:13: warning:
>> 'at91rm9200_udc_pullup' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c:1476:12: warning:
>> 'at91sam9263_udc_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 30 +++---------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c index 01a5907..85bfbf5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
>> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static int at91_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
>>
>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>
>> -static int at91rm9200_udc_init(struct at91_udc *udc)
>> +static __maybe_unused int at91rm9200_udc_init(struct at91_udc *udc)
>> {
>> struct at91_ep *ep;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -1376,7 +1376,8 @@ static int at91rm9200_udc_init(struct at91_udc
>> *udc) return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void at91rm9200_udc_pullup(struct at91_udc *udc, int is_on)
>> +static __maybe_unused
>> +void at91rm9200_udc_pullup(struct at91_udc *udc, int is_on)
>> {
>> int active = !udc->board.pullup_active_low;
>>
>> @@ -1473,31 +1474,6 @@ static const struct at91_udc_caps
>> at91sam9261_udc_caps = { };
>> #endif
>>
>> -static int at91sam9263_udc_init(struct at91_udc *udc)
>
> I'm a bit puzzled...
>
> For the at91rm9200 related boards it is enough to add __maybe_unused
> and leave the unused function in the source code.
>
> Hence, I'm wondering why do you remove the function for at91sam9263?
>
> Shouldn't all be removed or have added __maybe_unused ?
Hmm.. No, it seems there are no users for the at91sam9263_udc_init()
pollux:u-boot hs [master] $ grep -lr at91sam9263_udc_init .
./drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
pollux:u-boot hs [master] $
And in ./drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c it is only defined, but not used...
bye,
Heiko
>
>> -{
>> - struct at91_ep *ep;
>> - int i;
>> -
>> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_ENDPOINTS; i++) {
>> - ep = &udc->ep[i];
>> -
>> - switch (i) {
>> - case 0:
>> - case 1:
>> - case 2:
>> - case 3:
>> - ep->maxpacket = 64;
>> - break;
>> - case 4:
>> - case 5:
>> - ep->maxpacket = 256;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> int usb_gadget_handle_interrupts(int index)
>> {
>> struct at91_udc *udc = controller;
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> --
>
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
>
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 6:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] at91: fix smartweb board support Heiko Schocher
2017-06-22 6:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] drivers, usb, gadget: fix compiler warnings for at91_udc.c Heiko Schocher
2017-06-23 12:50 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-06-23 13:31 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2017-06-23 13:49 ` Tom Rini
2017-06-23 14:05 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-06-22 6:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] atmel, at91: fix smartweb board Heiko Schocher
2017-07-06 4:49 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=594D1837.2020305@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox