[U-Boot] [PATCH] spi: Zap lpc32xx_ssp driver-related code

[Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>]

Am 29.04.2019 um 19:57 schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:22:07AM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:22 AM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:08:34PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22.04.19 23:00, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:50:22PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jagan, Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/19/2019 09:48 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>> Dropped
>>>>>>> - lpc32xx_ssp driver
>>>>>>> - CONFIG_LPC32XX_SSP, LPC32XX_SSP_TIMEOUT items
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dropped due to:
>>>>>>> - no active updates
>>>>>>> - no dm conversion
>>>>>>> - multiple pings for asking dm-conversion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really don't want to rush into moaning, however let me ask you to drop
>>>>>> the reason given above as invalid, otherwise please clarify who were
>>>>>> the addressees of these 'multiple pings'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed.  Since it was only last month or so that I setup a low-traffic
>>>>> list for maintainers / custodians for important issues like this, [..]
>>>>
>>>> Wait, which list are you talking about? Should I be monitoring anything else
>>>> than this one?
>>>
>>> Ah, OK, so a new thing for my own mental checklist (which I ought to
>>> write down), there's now u-boot-custodians and u-boot-maintainers AT
>>> lists.denx.de, which are low volume custodian / maintainers only lists
>>> (they are public) to try and help avoid these "Hey, I maintain a board
>>> and just now found out I need to convert things for the next
>>> release?!?!?" problems, and similar.
>>
>> Right, I remember reading about the plan to have such lists here, but
>> I failed to find them by searching the docs in git or searching the web.
>>
>> And if I fail to find them, it could be me, but just maybe I'm not the only
>> maintainer not finding them ;-)
> 
> I emailed everyone that's listed in MAINTAINERS when the lists opened.
> I think this in part means there may be a board entry or two missing
> your email? :)

No, I'm not  a maintainer of officially supported boards. Unfortunately, 
we're having non-mainlined private boards only. And my entry as socfpga 
maintainer/co-custodioan has just been aded now ;-)

However, given the many companies out there using embedded Linux 
nowadays, I expect many such boards exist. Any while I understand we 
don't want to go into too much trouble of supporting such boards, I do 
think maintainers of such boards should be made aware of that list, too.

I guess we could note it in the toplevel README file, but finding it on 
denx.de would certainly help, too.

Regards,
Simon