[U-Boot] [PATCH 66/93] arm: Remove ot1200 board

Tom Rini
2018-11-22T13:32:02Z

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/22/2018 02:28 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline.
> >>>>> Remove it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there
> >>>> any hints want needs to be done
> >>>> to port thie board over to new DM stuff?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and
> >>> selecting/providing a dtb file. I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which
> >>> needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing.
> >>
> >> Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of
> >> DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ?
> >
> > In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended,
> > yes.
>
> If the board is limited, can it use only platdata ? Some platforms don't
> even have DT support at all.

I'm sorry, I don't quite follow you. If the board has limited resources
prior to full U-Boot then yes, platform data. If the board has so
limited resources during full U-Boot that we can't have a DT, what
platform are we talking about?

--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20181122/4af5d5e6/attachment.sig>