From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59046C04FFE for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 10:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904A188440; Wed, 8 May 2024 12:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rock-chips.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rock-chips.com header.i=@rock-chips.com header.b="FTBDmHBM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 1A9B58844B; Wed, 8 May 2024 12:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-m127103.qiye.163.com (mail-m127103.qiye.163.com [115.236.127.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C53F88436 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 12:00:59 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rock-chips.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kever.yang@rock-chips.com DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=FTBDmHBMLsE2x6enot+wBkCN/O8IrdjLrjygml3C/irOYZpiuE+NtYqfAv7rMMbxx/2LSiJnfzLhXNCu1iVx2uIp/O6TosB2nOYqshwN208Ihe9IFlp85IIOTeaxTwMKtuAm7sf2P0sx7lPXdDyZ0nBXfJgnUSkXTY1KUFuuK+k=; s=default; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rock-chips.com; v=1; bh=ji3xueZZ/jkp5jWcYImuH6rVEEIVLkfDdMba4XhyAyE=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; Received: from [172.16.12.77] (unknown [58.22.7.114]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id C8DFC900396; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:43 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <60ddc200-c3bb-41db-8d94-51761893cfde@rock-chips.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rockchip: add support for Theobroma Systems SOM-RK3588-Q7 Tiger module To: Quentin Schulz , Quentin Schulz , Tom Rini , Simon Glass , Philipp Tomsich , Klaus Goger , Heiko Stuebner Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de References: <20240423-tiger-v2-1-4a3fa0a01b5e@theobroma-systems.com> <0c9b591b-71a6-4a76-89b1-46a48f0183cf@rock-chips.com> <59c3ee19-f1c5-425d-912d-d418c7a2990b@cherry.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Kever Yang In-Reply-To: <59c3ee19-f1c5-425d-912d-d418c7a2990b@cherry.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFDSUNOT01LS0k3V1ktWUFJV1kPCRoVCBIfWUFZQksaHlYZGEsdQ05LTEtDSENVEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlOQ1VJSVVMVUpKT1lXWRYaDxIVHRRZQVlPS0hVSk1PSUxOVUpLS1VKQk tLWQY+ X-HM-Tid: 0a8f57a5f1c103a9kunmc8dfc900396 X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6P1E6NCo*VjNDHA8eHgFCN0Ip ORcaCS9VSlVKTEpOSk1JT09PTkJIVTMWGhIXVRAeDR4JVQIaFRw7CRQYEFYYExILCFUYFBZFWVdZ EgtZQVlOQ1VJSVVMVUpKT1lXWQgBWUFJQkJLNwY+ X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Quentin, On 2024/5/8 16:34, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Kever, > > On 5/8/24 4:42 AM, Kever Yang wrote: >> Hi Quentin, >> >>      Could you please update this patch with OF_UPSTREAM support? >> > > No, I cannot yet :/ > > Tiger is only available in Linux kernel v6.9-rcX and dts/ in U-Boot is > currently at v6.8. I see, then we may need to support the board without OF_UPSTREAM during the dts is available in kernel tree but not available in U-Boot dts/upstream. > > What are we supposed to do for this then? > > Would bumping dts/ to an -rc tag be ok for U-Boot? Hi Tom,     What's policy of the dts/upstream suppose to update? This is the typical issue there is gap between the dts merge in mainline kernel and available in next release. Thanks, - Kever > After all, those are rc and not "stable" branches. Do we need to wait > for the actual kernel release before bumping dts/ (so wait for up to 2 > months before supporting a board in U-Boot)? Should we have an > intermediate solution where we use the "old" model (NOT OF_UPSTREAM) > until we bump dts/ to the latest kernel release and the DTS is > available through OF_UPSTREAM? > > Cheers, > Quentin