From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?= <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:07:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [U-Boot] usb_stor_BBB_transport 5 ms delay - performance
In-Reply-To: <201207271459.29686.marex@denx.de>
Message-ID: <62491804.702622.1343398069634.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Marek,

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:59:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:20:48 PM, Jim Shimer wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a 5ms delay in usb_stor_BBB_transport, which occurs
> > > every
> > > 10K of
> > > data for fatload usb or 500ms of delay per 1MB of image size.
> > >  This
> > > adds up
> > > to quite a bit of delay if you're loading a large ramdisk.
> > > 
> > > Does anyone know what the reason for the 5ms delay really is?
> > >  I'm
> > > assuming
> > > that this delay is to debounce the 5V/100ma USB power up.  I made
> > > some
> > > modification, where the delay is skipped if the device has
> > > already
> > > been
> > > queried as ready.  This has save me 500ms/M on fatload times (eg,
> > > 140M=70seconds).  Is there anything wrong with this tweak?
> > > 
> > > Here's a diff of what I've done to get the performance I need:
> > > 
> > > --- usb_storage.c.orig  2012-07-26 16:06:40.775251000 -0400
> > > +++ usb_storage.c       2012-07-26 13:49:36.000000000 -0400
> > > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static block_dev_desc_t usb_dev_desc[USB
> > > 
> > >  struct us_data;
> > >  typedef int (*trans_cmnd)(ccb *cb, struct us_data *data);
> > >  typedef int (*trans_reset)(struct us_data *data);
> > > 
> > > +typedef enum us_status { USB_NOT_READY, USB_READY} us_status;
> > > 
> > >  struct us_data {
> > >  
> > >         struct usb_device *pusb_dev;     /* this usb_device */
> > > 
> > > @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ struct us_data {
> > > 
> > >         ccb             *srb;                   /* current srb */
> > >         trans_reset     transport_reset;        /* reset routine
> > >         */
> > >         trans_cmnd      transport;              /* transport
> > >         routine
> > >         */
> > > 
> > > +       us_status       status;
> > > 
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];
> > > 
> > > @@ -691,7 +693,10 @@ int usb_stor_BBB_transport(ccb *srb, str
> > > 
> > >                 usb_stor_BBB_reset(us);
> > >                 return USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_FAILED;
> > >         
> > >         }
> > > 
> > > -       wait_ms(5);
> > > +       if(us->status != USB_READY)
> > > +       {
> > > +               wait_ms(5);
> > > +       }
> > > 
> > >         pipein = usb_rcvbulkpipe(us->pusb_dev, us->ep_in);
> > >         pipeout = usb_sndbulkpipe(us->pusb_dev, us->ep_out);
> > >         /* DATA phase + error handling */
> > > 
> > > @@ -957,7 +962,10 @@ static int usb_test_unit_ready(ccb *srb,
> > > 
> > >                 srb->datalen = 0;
> > >                 srb->cmdlen = 12;
> > >                 if (ss->transport(srb, ss) ==
> > >                 USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_GOOD)
> > > 
> > > +               {
> > > +                       ss->status = USB_READY;
> > > 
> > >                         return 0;
> > > 
> > > +               }
> > > 
> > >                 usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> > >                 wait_ms(100);
> > >         
> > >         } while (retries--);
> > > 
> > > @@ -965,6 +973,11 @@ static int usb_test_unit_ready(ccb *srb,
> > > 
> > >         return -1;
> > >  
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > +static void usb_set_unit_not_ready(struct us_data *ss)
> > > +{
> > > +       ss->status = USB_NOT_READY;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > 
> > >  static int usb_read_capacity(ccb *srb, struct us_data *ss)
> > >  {
> > >  
> > >         int retry;
> > > 
> > > @@ -1108,6 +1121,7 @@ retry_it:
> > >                 blks -= smallblks;
> > >                 buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > >         
> > >         } while (blks != 0);
> > > 
> > > +       usb_set_unit_not_ready((struct us_data *)dev->privptr);
> > > 
> > >         USB_STOR_PRINTF("usb_read: end startblk %lx, blccnt %x
> > >         buffer
> > > 
> > > %lx\n",
> > > 
> > >                         start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> > > 
> > > @@ -1188,6 +1202,7 @@ retry_it:
> > >                 blks -= smallblks;
> > >                 buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > >         
> > >         } while (blks != 0);
> > > 
> > > +       usb_set_unit_not_ready((struct us_data *)dev->privptr);
> > > 
> > >         USB_STOR_PRINTF("usb_write: end startblk %lx, blccnt %x
> > >         buffer
> > > 
> > > %lx\n",
> > > 
> > >                         start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> > > 
> > > @@ -1398,6 +1413,7 @@ int usb_stor_get_info(struct usb_device
> > > 
> > >                 cap[0] = 2880;
> > >                 cap[1] = 0x200;
> > >         
> > >         }
> > > 
> > > +       usb_set_unit_not_ready((struct us_data *)dev->privptr);
> > > 
> > >         USB_STOR_PRINTF("Read Capacity returns: 0x%lx, 0x%lx\n",
> > >         cap[0],
> > >         
> > >                         cap[1]);
> > >  
> > >  #if 0
> > > 
> > > I'd appreciate any feedback.
> > > Regards
> > 
> > I have not looked into this delay issue, but I had similar
> > performance
> > issues that I fixed with the following series:
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172052/
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172204/
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172054/
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172055/
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172056/
> > 
> > Your suggestion is interesting and might be a complement to my
> > series. I
> > don't have time to check its correctness right now, but I'll try
> > soon.
> 
> Will you two have time to work these into V2 of your series somehow
> please?

Are you asking me to integrate Jim's patch in my series with his SoB once
reviewed?

Since I have already issued a v2 for 2/5, do you want a v3 of the whole series
to be more clear?

Regards,
Beno?t