public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] PPC Discontiguous Memory Space
@ 2006-09-15 19:45 jbahr
  2006-09-15 22:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: jbahr @ 2006-09-15 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


We have a client building a PPC8548-based product who insists that we
allocate DRAM real address space in two large chunks at 0-2GB and 4-6GB in
the 36-bit address space.  It doesn't look like U-Boot's bd_info structure
allows for that, and it doesn't look like the Linux init routines (which
accesses the passed table) knows how to handle discontiguous memory either
(as opposed to X86 Linux, which can accept an E820 table).

It looks like Linux cleans out the TLB's pretty quickly, so it wouldn't know
the VA-to-RA mapping.  

I've seen papers on some PPC Linuxes that handle large discontiguous real
DRAM memory spaces, but it doesn't look like the Linux in ELDK does.  Is
that correct?

This is just the start of a headache between the architects and we poor
implementers.  It's not clear to us that, even with ATMU support, how normal
drivers are going to know how to create real addresses for buffers and such
to use when programming DMA controllers or external PCI devices.

Any comments would be VERY appreciated.

Regards,
J
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PPC-Discontiguous-Memory-Space-tf2279504.html#a6331980
Sent from the Uboot - Users forum at Nabble.com.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-15 23:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-15 19:45 [U-Boot-Users] PPC Discontiguous Memory Space jbahr
2006-09-15 22:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-09-15 23:03   ` Jeffery Bahr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox