From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:22:34 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size In-Reply-To: <8d0d7b3e-b50d-4b9e-3b3a-142b793e649c@phytec.de> References: <8d0d7b3e-b50d-4b9e-3b3a-142b793e649c@phytec.de> Message-ID: <6703087.ZaicVt2Bgl@diego> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, Am Freitag, 5. April 2019, 12:10:21 CEST schrieb Wadim Egorov: > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based > board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage. > > So my question is: is there any work going on to reduce the SPL size > even more? > > Besides that, I think I can remove the power stuff at the SPL stage from > our board. The SOM was redesigned and is equipped with an STM8 connected > to the RK818. The required setup we did before in the SPL is now done by > the ST controller. I know there are only a few SOMs without the STM8 out > in the wild. So if I remove it it will affect only a few people who > probably already have both boards. alternatively you could introduce a tpl-stage, similar to what Amarula does with their Vyasa board. With spl in ram there is obviously no size limitation anymore. But obviously if the power-fix isn't actually needed anymore, dropping it might be the easiest solution.