From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?= Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:13:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 15/19] nand: mxc: Switch NAND SPL to generic SPL In-Reply-To: References: <1360961665-10693-1-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <1360961665-10693-15-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <1520555937.67335.1361563759793.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <708859548.67831.1361567593481.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Fabio, On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Beno?t, > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau > wrote: > > > It looks very much like the issue that Marek had on i.MX53 (which > > self-resolved > > for an unknown reason). > > > > Try to enable the debug trace to see if anything else is printed after > > display_dram_config(). I would especially be interested in: > > debug("relocation Offset is: %08lx\n", gd->reloc_off); > > debug("monitor flash len: %08lX\n", monitor_flash_len); > > Here is the output: > > U-Boot 2013.01 (Feb 22 2013 - 18:00:50) > > U-Boot code: 87F00000 -> 87F2C184 BSS: -> 87F311B4 > CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 532 MHz. > Reset cause: POR > Board: MX31PDK > monitor len: 000311B4 > ramsize: 08000000 > TLB table from 87ff0000 to 87ff4000 > Top of RAM usable for U-Boot at: 87ff0000 > Reserving 196k for U-Boot at: 87fbe000 > Reserving 640k for malloc() at: 87f1e000 > Reserving 32 Bytes for Board Info at: 87f1dfe0 > Reserving 128 Bytes for Global Data at: 87f1df60 > New Stack Pointer is: 87f1df50 > RAM Configuration: > Bank #0: 80000000 128 MiB > relocation Offset is: 000be000 CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems fine according to this trace. But anyway, can you test with this change in mx31pdk.h? #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x84000000 #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x83000000 Can you try to revert 10/19, only for arm1136/start.S (1 line to restore)? There is an issue in this patch that I have already fixed in my v8. Best regards, Beno?t