Re: [RFC PATCH 02/28] cli: Add LIL shell

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

Dear Tom,

In message <20210707141418.GZ9516@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> 
> Have you validated one of those exceedingly complex boot scripts with a
> modern hush (and some fakery for u-boot commands) ?  No.

No, I havent.

I also don't claim that I know all the warts and issues with our old
hus, but for the ones I am aware the woraround usually splitting
complex or nested expressions into a sequence of simpler steps.  I
cannot remember any cases where the resulting code should be
incompatible to a shell without that specific bug.

And yes, I am aware of the problems with the distro_bootcmd stuff.
Thisis exactly what I had in mind when I wrote: if you run into such
situations you should lean back and reflect a bit.  I can undrstand
the intentions of all this stuff, but the implementation is a
horrible mess.

> I'm just
> saying I expect there to be enough risk-adverse groups that just
> dropping our old hush entirely might not be possible right away.  Of
> course, if all of the current in-tree complex cases Just Work, that
> might be a good argument against needing to keep such levels of
> backwards compatibility.

There is only one way to test this.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
The inappropriate cannot be beautiful.
             - Frank Lloyd Wright _The Future of Architecture_ (1953)