From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62339C433EF for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873EA84409; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:09:24 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1654942164; bh=MK6ZNqSpZhC6a+Y6+uAqCDE7QBvrMhwE0ITkQ5fBgmg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=v/OyDziiNbGgQWyrYZnnFdE2wl0SouCaBUn1mG53158HDyBEVKinkl8TaWjjwJYcB BD9ijgcmuNy2jK4hrB9aQUsax0BLcMU0iSN2tbBb+0+2KWx2cUZ2vrMlcdRX4XFked NdlzRIsZylQiQF96mTpdhXZL2ea894DKSe5/SBdRqFdU4OzzFYAmQw4fJ+r7U5Pd/A MQaUfy5P5hPFOaQXcvDeh3yDjO1NRuXgBnp9oMePI7AGLnI0XGvQZR3v7fgAXMChLt inPZtzLGObNkQmcknFK0wfFeJi7F8VhdKnMIxgDKFB6kB1++VvwxyQCz9KYFRbcaw3 d/mtJuaWCqr1g== Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p578adb1c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.138.219.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marex@denx.de) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48F84840E7; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:09:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1654942162; bh=MK6ZNqSpZhC6a+Y6+uAqCDE7QBvrMhwE0ITkQ5fBgmg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=BDVQhiESiezdKjeSWFpWUZIx3I7ZwEJ+1IIKitdKq4wlAoNmmFOrb8/LSO58c4MpM F5EaECI22CwXoIIYIqVC4RQobIgYDGIl+K0q2GIzhxfJ3+1TEjPhGMDU3Gdp6soqa0 UBaJyVtDaOG+FH5LDiJj3SviV0ZrfCE1RvXRWqltzTuVDkCSuBT+i/ToqmS7zMv+WN D1AzK9f+x4vobzmh7VMoaT25t8i0A3ObjeYg7Dj2wH2uBN5msrLEA+WLsnw/ly7OY+ VX3bdLCyWmzREcc05jdHIrWPMjwk+ULHYhFbOHL6F9nzutwpTX8DIv3lvejAy+jpt0 jdwcBYtumjKUQ== Message-ID: <76b06cdc-1fee-b297-e45b-e21b31965b71@denx.de> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:09:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] configs: imx8mm_data_modul_edm_sbc: not select SPL_RAM_DEVICE Content-Language: en-US To: Alper Nebi Yasak Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Peng Fan , "Peng Fan (OSS)" , sbabic@denx.de, festevam@gmail.com, trini@konsulko.com References: <20220603071715.15212-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <20220603071715.15212-3-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <652ebe3d-48a3-9c70-a21a-739541a73803@denx.de> <0b62a04b-8472-8f49-82ca-d1ba684d2e16@gmail.com> <764f7ae6-a4f8-861f-322e-67c55d11332f@denx.de> From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.5 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On 6/10/22 17:51, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote: > On 08/06/2022 01:54, Marek Vasut wrote: >> I still don't see why we should randomly damage board configs to work >> around what looks like a bug in binman -- are we now implementing >> workarounds instead of trying to fully understand issues and implement >> proper fixes for those ? >> >> Why can't we fix binman instead ? > > There aren't many people who understand binman internals enough to fix > things properly. Simon is less active recently, I'm not as productive as > I'd like (even then I don't know the C parts), and my availability will > get way worse in a few weeks. I wanted to prioritize reviews so that > others' work don't stall, didn't know when this could be fixed, thus a > clean workaround until then (not 'instead of') seemed OK. > > Anyway, doesn't matter now that I managed to send a fix, but I didn't > want to keep the question unanswered. Thanks, I appreciate the proper fix.