From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Bosch <stefan_b@posteo.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 22:43:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] arm: Add support for SoC S5P4418
In-Reply-To: <20200106210720.GM4866@bill-the-cat>
References: <d5145d1ba7ce0cd95bb6caaf4dfdb334@posteo.de>
 <20200106210720.GM4866@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <80a2d0977057b86e5ea1020d2e804258@posteo.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Tom,

thanks a lot for your quick reply.

On 06.01.2020 22:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:58:47PM +0100, Stefan Bosch wrote:
>> This patch adds support for SAMSUNG's ARM Cortex-A9 based S5P4418 SoC,
>> especially FriendlyARM's NanoPi2 and NanoPC-T2 boards. It is based on
>> https://github.com/friendlyarm/u-boot/tree/nanopi2-v2016.01. For 
>> v2016.01 I
>> have also made a working SPL (FriendlyARM U-Boot is using a closed 
>> source
>> 2nd-bootloader). My plan is to migrate this also to the current 
>> U-Boot.
>> 
>> Issues:
>> Please send me a value for "#define MACH_TYPE_S5P4418" for
>> arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h.
> 
> Do you really need to support non-DT kernels?
> 
I have adopted this from the original Code. What is the alternative?
Could you please give me more details (e.g. an example-board).

>> The size of the patch is over 700kB, so I will upload it on
>> http://www.denx.de/wiki/attach/U-Boot/TooBigPatches if not otherwise
>> instructed.
> 
> Ah, I would suggest splitting things up into smaller logical chunks (a
> patch per driver, separate SoC from board, etc) so they're all able to
> make it to patchwork, thanks!

Ok, I will try to split the patch into chunks <= 100kB without loosing 
the logic ;-)


Regards,
Stefan