From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:51:08 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sunxi: a64: Enable
	FIT Signature
In-Reply-To: <CAD6G_RSz0K=a7L2usvdn0P7D6GV-DZb-pG3Mssp+ZFmTPRB_5g@mail.gmail.com>
 (Jagan Teki's message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:46:52 +0530")
References: <1513144986-13619-1-git-send-email-jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
 <20171213153947.sbtu7b5hudy7xhpn@flea.lan>
 <877etq4nl0.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
 <CAD6G_RSz0K=a7L2usvdn0P7D6GV-DZb-pG3Mssp+ZFmTPRB_5g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87374d4rr7.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

>>>>> "Jagan" == Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com> writes:

 > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> wrote:
 >>>>>>> "Maxime" == Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes:
 >> 
 >> Hi,
 >> 
 >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
 >> >> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ config MACH_SUN50I
 >> >> select SUNXI_DRAM_DW_32BIT
 >> >> select FIT
 >> >> select SPL_LOAD_FIT
 >> >> +   imply FIT_SIGNATURE
 >> 
 >> > I'm really not sure we should force it by default. How much code size
 >> > is it adding?
 >> 
 >> Not only that, enabling FIT_SIGNATURE support disables support for the
 >> legacy images (uImage / boot.scr) for security reasons, so it may very
 >> well break existing setups.

 > Sorry, I didn't get why legacy images will disable with fit? It
 > depends how user can go with it, whether he want legacy or fit both
 > will work.

Not when you enable CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE. That option disables support
for the legacy images.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard