From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Detlev Zundel Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:19:47 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: Reading or writing jffs2 - how? In-Reply-To: <41C7E65C.7030002@egholm-nielsen.dk> (Martin Egholm Nielsen's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:01:16 +0100") References: <87hdmnuvpi.fsf@deepthought.outer.space.org> <41C6DD2F.5090800@egholm-nielsen.dk> <87ekhkc26l.fsf@deepthought.outer.space.org> <41C7E65C.7030002@egholm-nielsen.dk> Message-ID: <874qiffoh8.fsf@deepthought.outer.space.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Martin, >>>My board had only one configuration-file associated, but multiple >>>nand-size configurations. >>>The jffs2-image problems were related to the endianess problems of >>>mkfs.jffs2: >>>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-January/009091.html >> Another reason for using our ELDK - it has a working mkfs.jff2 ;) > Noo?! I used mkfs.jffs2 from ELDK 3.0: > > # mkfs.jffs2 --version > mkfs.jffs2 revision 1.25 > > # which mkfs.jffs2 > /usr/local/eldk/usr/bin/mkfs.jffs2 > > # cat /usr/local/eldk/version > ELDK version 3.0 > ppc_4xx: Build 2004-02-16 > > But ofcourse, I guess the above error blocked u-boot from putting the > correct image in the nand... Yes, I think that failure cannot be attributed to an endianness problem in the mkfs.jffs in the ELDK which works. Cheers Detlev -- Progress in mathematics comes from repeated acts of generalization. If mathematics is anything, it is the art of chosing the most elegant generalization for some abstract pattern. Thus esthetics is central. -- Douglas Hofstadter