From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:22:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM In-Reply-To: References: <20200119071050.16240-1-mrjoel@lixil.net> Message-ID: <877dyfei1u.fsf@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stefan, On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote: >> >> This set of patches applies on top of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/, >> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a >> related patch series. >> >> >> Joel Johnson (4): >> cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header >> cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig >> arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc >> arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM >> >> board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- >> cmd/Kconfig | 1 + >> cmd/sys_eeprom.c | 1 + >> configs/clearfog_defconfig | 1 - >> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the > Baruch's work? Can it be dropped? Which work are you referring to? The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand these patches are still useful. Joel, correct me if I am wrong. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -