[U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture?

[Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>]

On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:16:35 +0900,
Simon Glass wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 16 May 2016 at 00:18, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:19:39 +0900,
> > Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada
> >> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> >> > 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>:
> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> >>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>:
> >> >>> > Hi,
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to
> >> >>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Regards,
> >> >>> > Simon
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit,
> >> >>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi,
> >> >>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him,
> >> >>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution...
> >> >>> Nobuhiro?
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture..
> >> >> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too?
> >> >
> >> > Agree.  Jeff talked about that at Dublin.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update?
> >>
> >
> > I have converted code, but it can't be tested by a exsitance target.
> >
> 
> Are you planning to send patches? We could still take them given that
> the alternative is removal. Is there an emulator/qemu?

OK. I will convert to qemu target (r2dplus).
Please wait few days.

Thanks.

> Regards,
> Simon

-- 
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>