U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>
Cc: "Emanuele Ghidoli" <ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com>,
	 "Tom Rini" <trini@konsulko.com>,
	 "Patrice Chotard" <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
	u-boot@lists.u-boot-project.org,  "Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	 "Stefan Roese" <stefan.roese@mailbox.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on colibri-imx7 due to commit 9c1b13b3fd27 ("cyclic: reduce get_timer_us() calls inside hlist_for_each_entry_safe()")
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:05:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a4rgrhor.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c11f834-7b7a-4e94-90b3-23de79040b4a@mailbox.org> (Marek Vasut's message of "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:00:08 +0200")

On Fri, Jul 24 2026, "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:

> On 7/23/26 10:41 PM, Emanuele Ghidoli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/26 20:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 7/23/26 4:53 PM, Emanuele Ghidoli wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>> I found that Colibri iMX7 no longer boots when commit 9c1b13b3fd27
>>>> ("cyclic: reduce get_timer_us() calls inside hlist_for_each_entry_safe()")
>>>> is applied. Nothing is printed on the serial.
>>>>
>>>> I bisected the issue: booting the parent commit works fine, and
>>>> reverting this patch on top of current main also restores
>>>> boot. It's not yet obvious to me what in this change causes the
>>>> regression.
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to revert it until the root cause is found?
>>>
>>> Give Patrice a bit of time to analyze the problem.
>>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> after the regression, get_timer_us() is called on every cyclic_run() call,
>> even when the cyclic list is empty. On imx7 this happens earlier than before,
>> when the timer has not yet been initialized: get_timer_us() calls get_tbclk(),
>> whose value is zero, and uses it as a divisor in tick_to_time_us(), leading to
>> a division by zero.
>>
>> I would fix this by ensuring get_tbclk() returns at least 1 on imx7, but we
>> could hide bugs in this way. However, this bug could also be present on other
>> architectures, so I would just guard against entering the cyclic loop by
>> checking whether the list is empty before doing anything else, so
>> get_timer_us() is called "at the same point in time" as before.
>> Something like:
>> if (hlist_empty(cyclic_get_list())) {
>> 	gd->flags &= ~GD_FLG_CYCLIC_RUNNING;
>> 	return;
>> }
> It looks like there are two topics -- optimize the cyclic run and fix
> the MX7 timer.
>
> I agree the cyclic run should exit if the list is empty, but please wait
> for input from Rasmus on that.
>

Yes, we could/should definitely exit early if the list is empty, but
don't mix it up with the GD_FLG_CYCLIC_RUNNING bit. Just add it as a
separate early exit condition. But a future reader might read that as
"just" an optimization, seeing that the loop would just do nothing, I
think it also requires an explanation. Something like

diff --git a/common/cyclic.c b/common/cyclic.c
index 573e715587d..e46346536ab 100644
--- a/common/cyclic.c
+++ b/common/cyclic.c
@@ -69,6 +69,19 @@ static void cyclic_run(void)
        struct hlist_node *tmp;
        u64 now, after, cpu_time;
 
+       /*
+        * Nothing to do if the list is empty. Also, schedule() can be
+        * called before timer infrastructure is ready, in which case
+        * calling get_timer_us() before the (empty) loop could cause
+        * a divide-by-0 or otherwise crash the system. No clients
+        * should be registered before the timer infrastructure is up,
+        * so the check for the list being empty should be
+        * ok. Otherwise, we would need a new GD_FLG_TIMERS_READY
+        * flag.
+        */
+       if (hlist_empty(cyclic_get_list()))
+                return;
+
        /* Prevent recursion */
        if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_CYCLIC_RUNNING)
                return;

Completely unrelated, but now that I see a new use of that
cyclic_get_list() helper, I think it's time to get rid of that and just
spell it &gd->cyclic_list. It was only needed back when gd was
volatile-qualified.

Rasmus

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 14:53 Regression on colibri-imx7 due to commit 9c1b13b3fd27 ("cyclic: reduce get_timer_us() calls inside hlist_for_each_entry_safe()") Emanuele Ghidoli
2026-07-23 18:35 ` Marek Vasut via U-Boot
2026-07-23 20:41   ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2026-07-24  0:00     ` Marek Vasut via U-Boot
2026-07-24  7:05       ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2026-07-24  7:36       ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2026-07-26  6:41         ` Marek Vasut via U-Boot
2026-07-28  9:46           ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2026-07-28 11:53             ` Marek Vasut via U-Boot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a4rgrhor.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=stefan.roese@mailbox.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.u-boot-project.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox