From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Steam Lin <stlin2@winbond.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
<u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01,02}jv behave correctly
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:13:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a534exwc.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702092313.970234-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> (Miquel Raynal's message of "Wed, 2 Jul 2025 11:23:13 +0200")
Hello,
On 02/07/2025 at 11:23:13 +02, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> These chips are internally made of two/four dies with linear addressing
> capabilities to make it transparent to the user that two/four dies were
> used. There is one drawback however, the read status operation is racy
> as the status bit only gives the active die status and not the status of
> the other die. For commands affecting the two dies, it means if another
> command is sent too fast after the first die has returned a valid
> status (deviation can be up to 200us), the chip will get corrupted/in an
> unstable state.
>
> The solution adopted here is to iterate manually over all internal
> dies (which takes about 30us per die) until all are ready. This approach
> will always be faster than a blind delay which represents the maximum
> deviation, while also being totally safe.
>
> A flash-specific hook for the status register read had to be
> implemented. Testing with the flash_speed benchmark in Linux shown no
> difference with the existing performances (using the regular status read
> core function).
>
> As the presence of multiple dies is not filled in these chips SFDP
> tables (the table containing the crucial information is optional), we
> need to manually wire the hook.
>
> This change is adapted from Linux.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250110-winbond-6-12-rc1-nor-volatile-bit-v3-1-735363f8cc7d@bootlin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Same question for this one, no feedback for the past 2 months, I'm not
sure who's supposed to take these, Jagan and Vignesh you are marked M:
in maintainers, any chances this can get it?
Thanks a lot,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 9:23 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01, 02}jv behave correctly Miquel Raynal
2025-09-09 10:13 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2025-09-09 12:07 ` Jagan Teki
2025-09-09 12:30 ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01,02}jv " Miquel Raynal
2025-09-09 17:08 ` Raghavendra, Vignesh
2025-09-10 5:28 ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01, 02}jv " Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2025-11-13 9:44 ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01,02}jv " Miquel Raynal
2026-02-13 20:16 ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Make sure w25q{01, 02}jv " Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a534exwc.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=stlin2@winbond.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox