From: "Markus Klotzbücher" <mk@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PXA27x USB device
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:20:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bqh0j3ey.fsf@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705031029.39472.sr@denx.de> (Stefan Roese's message of "Thu, 3 May 2007 10:29:38 +0200")
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> writes:
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 09:49, Markus Klotzb?cher wrote:
>> Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> writes:
>> > I'm looking at drivers/usbdcore_mpc8xx.c for an implementation example
>> > but I don't understand why such support has been put there instead of
>> > cpu/mpc8xx directory.
>> >
>> > Can someone explain to me why? Should I put my PXA27x support also
>> > there?
>>
>> I have no idea why this is so, but it does seem wrong to me. Platform
>> specific code should go into the corresponding cpu/ directory, and so
>> should your pxa support.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> We had a lengthy discussion about the right places for such drivers a few
> months ago. IIRC the consent was to put them into the drivers directory
> (please correct me, if my memory fails me here). But we wanted to structure
> this directly better. So I would suggest something like:
>
> drivers/usb/device/mpc8xx.c
> drivers/usb/device/pxa27x.c
>
> or even
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/mpc8xx.c
> drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x.c
>
> to follow the Linux example a little more.
>
> Any comments?
Hmm. Seems reasonable, especially if this structure will be used for all
drivers. But is this the case? I still feel uncomfortable about placing
a cpu dependant host controller driver in a generic driver
directory. Will such a driver be maintained mainly by the USB Custodian
or the respective Architecture Custodian? I would assume the latter.
Best regards
Markus
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-04 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 14:05 [U-Boot-Users] PXA27x USB device Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-02 22:05 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2007-05-03 7:49 ` Markus Klotzbücher
2007-05-03 8:29 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-03 10:15 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-04 10:20 ` Markus Klotzbücher [this message]
2007-05-04 11:47 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-04 12:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-07 11:55 ` Markus Klotzbücher
2007-05-07 12:22 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-07 13:23 ` Markus Klotzbücher
2007-05-07 15:22 ` Robert Schwebel
2007-05-07 19:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-08 6:39 ` Markus Klotzbücher
2007-05-08 8:47 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-08 10:04 ` Markus Klotzbücher
2007-05-08 12:49 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-05-08 14:14 ` Loeliger Jon-LOELIGER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bqh0j3ey.fsf@denx.de \
--to=mk@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox