From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Detlev Zundel Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:13:55 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] tiny patch for examples/Makefile (objcopy related) In-Reply-To: <20031207200513.42B50C5F5F@atlas.denx.de> (Wolfgang Denk's message of "Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:05:08 +0100") References: <20031207200513.42B50C5F5F@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <87d6awmz0c.fsf@deepthought.outer.space.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Wolfgang & Cam, > Dear Cam, > > in message <3FCDEA1B.6010306@mesias.co.uk> you wrote: >> >> Here is a short patch for the examples/Makefile. This improves >> reliability in the case of a deficient toolchain. >> >> diff -urN u-boot-1.0.0.orig/examples/Makefile u-boot-1.0.0/examples/Makefile >> --- u-boot-1.0.0.orig/examples/Makefile 2003-10-14 20:43:56.000000000 +0100 >> +++ u-boot-1.0.0/examples/Makefile 2003-12-03 11:21:04.000000000 +0000 >> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ >> $(OBJCOPY) -O srec $(<:.o=) $@ >> >> %.bin: %.srec >> - $(OBJCOPY) -O binary $< $@ 2>/dev/null >> + $(OBJCOPY) -O binary $(<:.srec=) $@ 2>/dev/null >> >> ######################################################################### > Thanks, added. Are you aware, that you effectively have a misleading rule now? The rule says how to generate ".bin" from ".srec" files, while in the command pattern you explicitely use none of the prerequisites but the hand-derived ELF file. This might potentially mess up make's rule algorithm. As I am on holiday right now, I am too lazy to come up with a cleaner fix, I just wanted to phrase my concern. Cheers Detlev -- :!emacs %