U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Allocate and flush dwc->ep0_trb in a cache aligned manner
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:20:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efq3kwd9.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f303f10-36a0-1e7a-75e0-02c88fd08474@ti.com>


Hi,

Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Monday 16 October 2017 07:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> writes:
>>> On 10/16/2017 07:21 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>> A flush of the cache is required before any outbound DMA access can
>>>> take place. The minimum size that can be flushed from the cache is
>>>> one cache line size. Therefore, any buffer allocated for DMA should
>>>> be in multiples of cache line size.
>>>>
>>>> Thus, allocate memory for ep0_trb in multiples of cache line size.
>>>>
>>>> Also, when local variable trb is assigned to dwc->ep0_trb[1] and used
>>>> to flush cache, it leads to cache misaligned messages as only the base
>>>> address dwc->ep0_trb is cache aligned.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, flush cache using ep0_trb_addr which is always cache aligned.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
>>>
>>> SGTM, Felipe, can you review this please ?
>> 
>> is cache maintenance done correctly in u-boot? Isn't the whole idea of a
>> coherent memory area that is is non-cacheable, non-bufferable memory?
>> 
>> Also, why isn't the API itself guaranteeing alignment requirements?
>> 
> There is no support in u-boot to make a memory area non-cacheable.
> This is the definition of dma_alloc_coherent()
>
> static inline void *dma_alloc_coherent(size_t len, unsigned long *handle)
> {
>         *handle = (unsigned long)memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, len);
>         return (void *)*handle;
> }
>
> This driver is mostly copied from kernel (where dma_alloc_coherent() is
> what you describe) and extra flush_cache functions are added because of
> U-Boot's inability to allocate coherent memory.

then that's what should be fixed. No?

-- 
balbi

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-16  5:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Allocate and flush dwc->ep0_trb in a cache aligned manner Faiz Abbas
2017-10-16 10:12 ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-16 13:55   ` Felipe Balbi
2017-10-16 14:15     ` Faiz Abbas
2017-10-16 14:20       ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2017-10-16 14:41         ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-16 14:50         ` Faiz Abbas
2017-10-16 14:51           ` Felipe Balbi
2017-10-16 15:22             ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-17  5:25               ` Faiz Abbas
2017-10-17 10:01                 ` Marek Vasut
2017-10-17 11:10                   ` Faiz Abbas
2017-10-17 11:14                     ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87efq3kwd9.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox