From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:21:00 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] usb: gadget: f_dfu: write req->actual bytes In-Reply-To: <20170221233147.5c5240ac@jawa> References: <87wpcupb9t.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20170213144102.37d73a16@jawa> <87shn7x07j.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20170221125802.59dee61e@jawa> <87mvdfwviu.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20170221142132.65ff0c94@jawa> <87lgszpmw5.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20170221233147.5c5240ac@jawa> Message-ID: <87efyqwphf.fsf@linux.intel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, Lukasz Majewski writes: [snip] >> > I do appreciate that you tested it - even better, that with >> > different approach. >> > >> > However, some time ago Stephen Warren has rewritten tests for DFU, >> > UMS to use some python infrastructure. Those tests (especially DFU, >> > test corner cases - ZLP, +/-1B to packet size, etc). >> >> that's exactly what I tested :-) >> >> > If you want, you can add your board to them. >> >> I'll see how to do that and maybe add to the TODO list >> > > Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski > > Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski > > Test HW: BBB (am335x) - with tests/py/dfu > > I've added your patch to u-boot-dfu tree. I will send PR tomorrow. yeah, cool thanks ;-) > You may also want to look into patches from Patrick Delaunay (those > also will be added to PR): > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/704131/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/706492/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/706493/ they look fine to my eyes. I have two extra patches (coming shortly) to make USB Command Verifier tool (from USB-IF) happy with our DFU implementation. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: