From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA23C36010 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 04:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467C381D6C; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 05:24:49 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="iqyig8oK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 5A3B581951; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:01:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12EFE803CC for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:01:16 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A582944264; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:01:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1743001275; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YyZTnJbI6gx1p0lJTm9YdlbQedAIEgckuOtR/7wtfd0=; b=iqyig8oK7V6s/UgzTygipH24mdDoX1+tKXtAXfkrYSKF/RCsyAEnPqwnon+RGImGJhAuGG 4vP3D6amSJUW3sr2n5QHS2pyWYpNMENO8VbghSRVPpujA1uJuzvrHhNFqjTssaRCZ2zeSL fCSW29VuoeSLLIPJwwMa1RnVlzoQt3dyPAsR2DU5g7SWz/zwPyaCY5R92iuLFYZ/06FDfa xoAEa6MCa0/4tX5jdzqtYl/pYOTPBRMfqEU4nnGDd66eDOL0wCO00Li/c+Oc6pFqnxlZ2R cm4e1omtMbLtpCZH57Nz7Py4sC2AK3zPadmLuy96McBB8ZaKTjo+sjWL9+C58Q== From: Miquel Raynal To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Svyatoslav Ryhel , Tom Rini , Simon Glass , Jaehoon Chung , Lukasz Majewski , Sean Anderson , Anatolij Gustschin , Peng Fan , Mario Six , Thomas Petazzoni , u-boot@lists.denx.de, Ian Ray , Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi , Dario Binacchi , Adam Ford , Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Add imx8mp video support In-Reply-To: (Fabio Estevam's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:26:30 -0300") References: <20250129-ge-mainline-display-support-v4-0-a43b3657ed7c@bootlin.com> <20250303170640.GS2640854@bill-the-cat> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:01:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87pli3q1j9.fsf@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduieehkeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhgffffkgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepofhiqhhuvghlucftrgihnhgrlhcuoehmihhquhgvlhdrrhgrhihnrghlsegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffgefhjedtfeeigeduudekudejkedtiefhleelueeiueevheekvdeludehiedvfeenucfkphepledtrdekledrudeifedruddvjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeeltddrkeelrdduieefrdduvdejpdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihhquhgvlhdrrhgrhihnrghlsegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedujedprhgtphhtthhopehfvghsthgvvhgrmhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegtlhgrmhhorhelheesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehtrhhinhhisehkohhnshhulhhkohdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsjhhgsegthhhrohhmihhumhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehjhhektddrtghhuhhnghesshgrmhhsuhhnghdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehluhhkmhgrseguvghng idruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepshgvrghnghgrvdesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrghhushhtseguvghngidruggv X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 05:24:46 +0100 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Fabio, On 13/03/2025 at 15:26:30 -03, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Miquel, > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 2:15=E2=80=AFPM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > >> If seems that we are working on the same OF graph stuff > > Yes, there is a conflict in next when I try to apply your series due > to recent commits from Svyatoslav. > > Please rebase against the latest next, run it through CI, and submit a > v5. I rebased this work on the latest next, fixed the conflicts, adapted my changes to use Svyatoslav's work, fixed the CI. Then I pushed a PR to trigger azure tests and figured out you applied more patches (imx8 clock related) which conflicted. So I rebased again and fixed the conflicts. Azure testing is failing though. I just pushed an empty branch with just today's 'next' and it is already failing, my series does not produce additional warnings as far as I can see. So I am sending a series that has been tested locally. dm unit tests pass, v5 is on its way. Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l