From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus =?iso-8859-1?Q?Klotzb=FCcher?= <mk@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:07:12 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] reg ISP 1561 integration with u-boot1.1.6
In-Reply-To: <200701111606.12878.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> (Matthias
	Fuchs's message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:06:12 +0100")
References: <4ac2955e0701040358u5699f021o163696f8cf70ba4a@mail.gmail.com>
	<200701111339.01196.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
	<877ivtu003.fsf@denx.de>
	<200701111606.12878.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
Message-ID: <87ps9ksdun.fsf@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Matthias,

Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> writes:

> Sounds reasonable to me. We still need a more pretty way to handle the
> +/- CFG_PCIRAM_BASE.  What about some cpu_to_bus/bus_to_cpu macros?

Hmm, that sounds a bit confusing too if you're only accessing a on chip
controller. How about just renaming the define to something more generic
such as CFG_OHCI_RAM_OFFSET and adding a nice explanation in the README?
That way it wouldn't seem so strongly related to pci.

Regards

	Markus