* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? @ 2015-10-18 12:19 Simon Glass 2015-10-18 15:30 ` Masahiro Yamada 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-10-18 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2015-10-18 12:19 [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? Simon Glass @ 2015-10-18 15:30 ` Masahiro Yamada 2015-10-18 15:54 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2015-10-18 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: > Hi, > > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? > > Regards, > Simon The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, but, indeed, no work for SH these days. Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... Nobuhiro? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2015-10-18 15:30 ` Masahiro Yamada @ 2015-10-18 15:54 ` Tom Rini 2015-10-18 16:19 ` Masahiro Yamada 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2015-10-18 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: > > Hi, > > > > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to > > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, > but, indeed, no work for SH these days. > > Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, > he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. > > If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, > he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... > Nobuhiro? I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20151018/2b6680e8/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2015-10-18 15:54 ` Tom Rini @ 2015-10-18 16:19 ` Masahiro Yamada 2016-05-14 23:19 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2015-10-18 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to >> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Simon >> >> >> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, >> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. >> >> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, >> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. >> >> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, >> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... >> Nobuhiro? > > I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. > Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2015-10-18 16:19 ` Masahiro Yamada @ 2016-05-14 23:19 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-16 6:18 ` Yoshinori Sato 2016-05-17 9:24 ` Kieran Bingham 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2016-05-14 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to >>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Simon >>> >>> >>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, >>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. >>> >>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, >>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. >>> >>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, >>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... >>> Nobuhiro? >> >> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. >> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? > > Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. > I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update? Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2016-05-14 23:19 ` Simon Glass @ 2016-05-16 6:18 ` Yoshinori Sato 2016-05-16 13:16 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-17 9:24 ` Kieran Bingham 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2016-05-16 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:19:39 +0900, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > > 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to > >>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Simon > >>> > >>> > >>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, > >>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. > >>> > >>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, > >>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. > >>> > >>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, > >>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... > >>> Nobuhiro? > >> > >> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. > >> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? > > > > Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. > > > > I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update? > I have converted code, but it can't be tested by a exsitance target. > Regards, > Simon > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot -- Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2016-05-16 6:18 ` Yoshinori Sato @ 2016-05-16 13:16 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-17 8:02 ` Yoshinori Sato 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2016-05-16 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 16 May 2016 at 00:18, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:19:39 +0900, > Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada >> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: >> > 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> >>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: >> >>> > Hi, >> >>> > >> >>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to >> >>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? >> >>> > >> >>> > Regards, >> >>> > Simon >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, >> >>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. >> >>> >> >>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, >> >>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. >> >>> >> >>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, >> >>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... >> >>> Nobuhiro? >> >> >> >> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. >> >> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? >> > >> > Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. >> > >> >> I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update? >> > > I have converted code, but it can't be tested by a exsitance target. > Are you planning to send patches? We could still take them given that the alternative is removal. Is there an emulator/qemu? Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2016-05-16 13:16 ` Simon Glass @ 2016-05-17 8:02 ` Yoshinori Sato 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2016-05-17 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:16:35 +0900, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > On 16 May 2016 at 00:18, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote: > > On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:19:39 +0900, > > Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada > >> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > >> > 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: > >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> >>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: > >> >>> > Hi, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to > >> >>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Regards, > >> >>> > Simon > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, > >> >>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. > >> >>> > >> >>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, > >> >>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. > >> >>> > >> >>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, > >> >>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... > >> >>> Nobuhiro? > >> >> > >> >> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. > >> >> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? > >> > > >> > Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. > >> > > >> > >> I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update? > >> > > > > I have converted code, but it can't be tested by a exsitance target. > > > > Are you planning to send patches? We could still take them given that > the alternative is removal. Is there an emulator/qemu? OK. I will convert to qemu target (r2dplus). Please wait few days. Thanks. > Regards, > Simon -- Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? 2016-05-14 23:19 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-16 6:18 ` Yoshinori Sato @ 2016-05-17 9:24 ` Kieran Bingham 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Kieran Bingham @ 2016-05-17 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 15 May 2016 at 00:19, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 18 October 2015 at 10:19, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: >> 2015-10-19 0:54 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>: >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:30:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>>> 2015-10-18 21:19 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>: >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > It looks like these have no maintainer and have not been converted to >>>> > generic board. Should we remove the 'sh' architecture? >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > Simon >>>> >>>> >>>> The maintainer, Nobuhiro, was at the U-Boot mini summit, >>>> but, indeed, no work for SH these days. >>>> >>>> Since he left Renesas and went back to Hitachi, >>>> he is now a complete volunteer, I guess. >>>> >>>> If the maintainer responsibility is painful for him, >>>> he can take a step back, but I hope he can continue contribution... >>>> Nobuhiro? >>> >>> I'd hate to see SH2 leave since it's becoming the J-Core architecture.. >>> Perhaps someone in the community would like to help out too? >> >> Agree. Jeff talked about that at Dublin. >> > > I haven't seen any activity. Does anyone have an update? Hi Simon, Yes - there is definitely activity. Jeff and Rob presented again at ELC, San Diego, and gave out dev-boards (I have one) - and they are starting a kick-starter project to get a RasperryPi form factor board out with an FPGA to run the cores / development. There is a working kernel and toolchain. I'd certainly hope U-Boot support could be used in the future too. http://j-core.org/roadmap.html is probably the most up-to-date plan there is currently. The current dev-board (a Numato FPGA) doesn't have USB or Ethernet, but does have an SD Card, Perhaps uboot doesn't give much added value there currently- but when the Kickstarter board comes out (there are 10 prototypes in existence already) that will have both USB and Eth - so U-Boot will have much more appeal! -- Regards KIeran > > Regards, > Simon > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-17 9:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-10-18 12:19 [U-Boot] Remove sh2, sh3, sh4 architecture? Simon Glass 2015-10-18 15:30 ` Masahiro Yamada 2015-10-18 15:54 ` Tom Rini 2015-10-18 16:19 ` Masahiro Yamada 2016-05-14 23:19 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-16 6:18 ` Yoshinori Sato 2016-05-16 13:16 ` Simon Glass 2016-05-17 8:02 ` Yoshinori Sato 2016-05-17 9:24 ` Kieran Bingham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox