From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: make cache-maintenance on event buffers more robust
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:15:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zifvgti3.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bb1f19c-a7f5-bbc8-3a0d-6c2de73a7410@denx.de>
Hi,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> writes:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> index b2c7eb1..f58c7ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ static struct dwc3_event_buffer *dwc3_alloc_one_event_buffer(struct dwc3 *dwc,
>> if (!evt->buf)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> + dwc3_flush_cache((long)evt->buf, evt->length);
>> +
>
> Is the length aligned ? If not, you will get cache alignment warning.
> Also, address should be uintptr_t to avoid 32/64 bit issues .
if it's not aligned to 128 bits (at least, IIRC), DWC3 won't work.
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> index 1156662..61af71b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> @@ -2668,11 +2668,12 @@ void dwc3_gadget_uboot_handle_interrupt(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>> int i;
>> struct dwc3_event_buffer *evt;
>>
>> + dwc3_thread_interrupt(0, dwc);
>> +
>> + /* Clean + Invalidate the buffers after touching them */
>> for (i = 0; i < dwc->num_event_buffers; i++) {
>> evt = dwc->ev_buffs[i];
>> dwc3_flush_cache((long)evt->buf, evt->length);
>> }
>> -
>
> This makes me wonder, don't you need to invalidate the event buffer
> somewhere so that the new data would be fetched from RAM ?
nope. In linux we allocate from coherent
--
balbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 17:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: make cache-maintenance on event buffers more robust Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-04 16:15 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-04 17:46 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-04 19:01 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-04 19:56 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-04 20:09 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-04 20:26 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-05 10:25 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-05 10:57 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-05 11:25 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-05 8:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-04-05 8:33 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-04-05 9:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-04-05 8:43 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-05 8:15 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2017-04-05 8:43 ` Marek Vasut
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-08 6:09 mohammadjannati04
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zifvgti3.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox