From: Pete MacKay <linux@architechnical.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] MMC Card Problems with U-Boot 1.1.6
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:05:02 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8956363.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1defaf580702131451l22831b0dl9982c178393625b0@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the pointers! I replaced that with the values read from the CSD,
which was a task in itself as the 270 seemed to add a 0x3F and drop the
CRC/0x01 byte in the response (which is reversed byte-order).
You're right that the cards can be told apart with the proper init sequence
(the right way for submission), but I added 'sd' commands and interface in
the interest of time and preserving the original MMC code line. Fortunately
adding commands to u-boot is easy! :) CMD1 isn't supported in SD 2.0 (it
times out), which does added negotiation (CMD8/ACMD41). Linux very recently
added SDHC (high capacity) support and last I heard they were debating
whether the sequence should check for MMC first (CMD1) or SD (CMD8).
Alas, the kernel code is layered and complex, but is a good place to start.
I've been looking through it for 270 caveats (there are several) and now my
brain hurts...
Haavard Skinnemoen-2 wrote:
>
> I think I know where I'd start looking ;-)
>
> /* FIXME fill in the correct size (is set to 32MByte) */
> mmc_dev.blksz = 512;
> mmc_dev.lba = 0x10000;
>
> Btw, why do you need an sdinit command? It should be possible to tell
> the difference between SD and MMC cards automatically. In fact, I know
> it's possible because the Linux driver does it, and the at32ap7000 mmc
> driver I haven't submitted yet does it.
>
> Haavard
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MMC-Card-Problems-with-U-Boot-1.1.6-tf3189031.html#a8956363
Sent from the Uboot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-14 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-07 19:09 [U-Boot-Users] MMC Card Problems with U-Boot 1.1.6 sgobien
2007-02-13 22:27 ` Pete MacKay
2007-02-13 22:51 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-14 0:05 ` Pete MacKay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8956363.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=linux@architechnical.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox