public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tirumala Marri <tmarri@apm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:48:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9220a908182bb25c50db8d89c06566cb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100902115535.98934153781@gemini.denx.de>

Mr Wolfgang,
> Hm... is this APM82? Official press releases refer to this as
> APM821xx? Or ist it APM82xxx?
[Marri] You are correct APM821XX is right name.

>
> If you don't decide to print "64" here, then please pull all the
> APM82???
> code into a separate #ifdef block.
[Marri] Sure will do.

>
> > -#elif defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || defined(CONFIG_460EX) ||
> defined(CONFIG_460GT)
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || defined(CONFIG_460EX) || \
> > +      defined(CONFIG_460GT) || defined(CONFIG_APM82XXX)
> >  	lis	r1,0x0000		/* BAS = X_0000_0000 */
> >  	ori	r1,r1,0x0984		/* first 64k */
>
> Should the size be adjusted here, too?
[Marri] No, It is same as other SoCs.

>
> >  	mtdcr	ISRAM0_SB0CR,r1
> > @@ -752,7 +754,11 @@ _start:
> >  	mtdcr	ISRAM1_PMEG,r1
> >
> >  	lis	r1,0x0004		/* BAS = 4_0004_0000 */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_APM82XXX) /* APM82XXX only has 32KB of OCM */
> > +	ori     r1,r1,0x0784            /* 32k */
> > +#else
> >  	ori	r1,r1,0x0984		/* 64k */
>
> Please get rid of these magic numbers and add a #define for a symbolic
> constant so the code becomes readable, and the selection can be done
> on a per-CPU base, i. e. without needing #ifdef's here.


[Marri] I will define CONFIG_SYS_OCM_SIZE . But for now this is only added

Bluestone.h. I need to remove  "#if defined(CONFIG_APM821XX) I will have
to
Add CONFIG_SYS_OCM_SIZE to all the board config files which are based on
460Ex and 460GT.
I think that would be completely different patch.


>
>
> > diff --git a/include/ppc440.h b/include/ppc440.h
> > index c807dda..b5c1832 100644
> > --- a/include/ppc440.h
> > +++ b/include/ppc440.h
>
> Hm... you are adding a number of large blocks of code, all #ifdef'ed.
>
> This is ugly, difficult to read and difficult to maintain.
>
> Why not adding a new file  include/apm82xxx.h  instead?
>
[Marri] I will work on this .

Regards,
Marri

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-03  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-02  1:16 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support tmarri at apm.com
2010-09-02 11:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-02 18:01   ` Tirumala Marri
2010-09-02 19:01     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-03  7:46       ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-03  8:32         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-03 11:26           ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-03  1:48   ` Tirumala Marri [this message]
2010-09-03  7:18     ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9220a908182bb25c50db8d89c06566cb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tmarri@apm.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox