From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Przywara?= Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:39:28 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] Booting kernel/dtb with FIT image In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9980ea85-e364-7f74-37df-e2a0049f1622@arm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 13/01/17 17:13, Nicolas le bayon wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a problem I presently meet, any help or track to follow would be > welcome. > > My U-boot (2016.09) loads a kernel and a dtb, and "bootm" all this. This is > my reference, and this is correctly running. > > From this, I'm trying to implement FIT image management, so I enabled > CONFIG_FIT. > > On the other side, I constructed the ITS FILE from my kernel and my dtb, as > described below: > > */dts-v1/;* > */ {* > * description = "Simple image with single Linux kernel and FDT blob";* > * #address-cells = <0x1>;* > * images {* > * kernel at 1 {* > * description = "My Linux kernel";* > * data = /incbin/("./uImage");* uImage is usually the name of a kernel wrapped into a _legacy U-Boot image_. Now you are using the new FIT image, so I would use zImage as the source here instead, otherwise you will have it double wrapped. I guess U-Boot can't cope with that, also it would be a bit weird. So copy arch/arm/boot/zImage and use that instead. Cheers, Andre. > * type = "kernel";* > * arch = "arm";* > * os = "linux";* > * compression = "none";* > * load = <0x40008000>;* > * entry = <0x40008000>;* > * hash at 1 {* > * algo = "md5";* > * };* > * hash at 2 {* > * algo = "sha1";* > * };* > * };* > * fdt at 1 {* > * description = "My Flattened Device Tree blob";* > * data = /incbin/("./mydtb.dtb");* > * type = "flat_dt";* > * arch = "arm";* > * compression = "none";* > * hash at 1 {* > * algo = "md5";* > * };* > * hash at 2 {* > * algo = "sha1";* > * };* > * };* > * };* > */* a notable concept of FIT, configurations */* > * configurations {* > * default = "conf at 1";* > * conf at 1 {* > * description = "Boot Linux kernel with FDT blob";* > * kernel = "kernel at 1";* > * fdt = "fdt at 1";* > * };* > * };* > *};* > > I managed to construct the ITB (using the mkimage of my u-boot, in tools > directory) and to store it on my target. > > I load this ITB at 0x60000000 address of memory. > > The "bootm 0x60000000" gives the following error: "Ramdisk image is corrupt > or invalid". Indeed I have no ramdisk. Not what was described in tutorials. > > The "bootm 0x60000000 - " gives a better result: > *## Loading kernel from FIT Image at 60000000 ...* > * Using 'conf at 1' configuration* > * Trying 'kernel at 1' kernel subimage* > * Description: My Linux kernel* > * Type: Kernel Image* > * Compression: uncompressed* > * Data Start: 0x600000e4* > * Data Size: 5568600 Bytes = 5.3 MiB (Note: same size as the > original file!)* > * Architecture: ARM* > * OS: Linux* > * Load Address: 0x40008000* > * Entry Point: 0x40008000* > * Hash algo: md5* > * Hash value: 0cccb060e1c4f50e98d8f6c8ed61242e* > * Hash algo: sha1* > * Hash value: f0442dd1b8c4f006b25533c3148df2742fc8a7ad* > * Verifying Hash Integrity ... md5+ sha1+ OK* > *## Loading fdt from FIT Image at 60000000 ...* > * Using 'conf at 1' configuration* > * Trying 'fdt at 1' fdt subimage* > * Description: My Flattened Device Tree blob* > * Type: Flat Device Tree* > * Compression: uncompressed* > * Data Start: 0x6054fa70* > * Data Size: 55154 Bytes = 53.9 KiB **(Note: same size as the > original file!)* > * Architecture: ARM* > * Hash algo: md5* > * Hash value: a201db29486c7c70b707e085d0196fda* > * Hash algo: sha1* > * Hash value: adb751ba04c1aed120a329bb4812a9c8f0bb68a7* > * Verifying Hash Integrity ... md5+ sha1+ OK* > * Booting using the fdt blob at 0x6054fa70* > * Loading Kernel Image ... OK* > * Using Device Tree in place at 6054fa70, end 605601e1* > > *Starting kernel ...* > > And unfortunately nothing else after. > > I have the feeling to be in the same conditions, but I do not have the same > result. > > If you have any idea of what could be wrong, please let me know, it would > be welcomed. > Maybe some corrections have been pushed in this domain since v2016.09? > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >