[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

All of thse patches have been posted previously, and no one has
given feedback, so here they are in a handy branch for you to pull.

The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:

  Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git post

Mike Frysinger (5):
      post: fix up I/O helper usage
      post: add gpio hotkey support
      post: use ARRAY_SIZE
      post: new nor flash test
      serial: implement common uart post test

 common/serial.c                               |   90 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/post.h                                |    5 +-
 include/serial.h                              |    5 +
 post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c                     |    2 +-
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c                       |    4 +-
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c                         |    3 +-
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c                        |    4 +-
 post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c                         |    3 +-
 post/drivers/Makefile                         |    2 +-
 post/drivers/flash.c                          |  107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 post/drivers/memory.c                         |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/andi.c                       |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c                        |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c                       |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/cr.c                         |   12 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/load.c                       |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/multi.c                      |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c                     |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c                     |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c                      |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c                      |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/store.c                      |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/three.c                      |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/threei.c                     |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/threex.c                     |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/two.c                        |    3 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/twox.c                       |    3 +-
 post/post.c                                   |   23 +++++-
 post/tests.c                                  |   17 ++++-
 30 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 post/drivers/flash.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] post: fix up I/O helper usage

[Mike Frysinger]

The I/O API from Linux defaults to little endian accesses.  In order to
do big endian accesses, there are a "be" variants.  The "le32" variants
are arch-specific and not terribly common, so change it to the normal
Linux API funcs.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
 include/post.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/post.h b/include/post.h
index 519cef1..c9ec2f4 100644
--- a/include/post.h
+++ b/include/post.h
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
 
 static inline ulong post_word_load (void)
 {
-	return in_le32((volatile void *)(_POST_WORD_ADDR));
+	return inl((volatile void *)(_POST_WORD_ADDR));
 }
 
 static inline void post_word_store (ulong value)
 {
-	out_le32((volatile void *)(_POST_WORD_ADDR), value);
+	outl(value, (volatile void *)(_POST_WORD_ADDR));
 }
 #endif /* defined (CONFIG_POST) || defined(CONFIG_LOGBUFFER) */
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
-- 
1.7.5.3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] post: add gpio hotkey support

[Mike Frysinger]

Now that we have the generic GPIO layer, we can easily provide a common
implementation for the post_hotkeys_pressed() function based on it.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
 post/post.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/post/post.c b/post/post.c
index 1b7f2aa..ecea1e1 100644
--- a/post/post.c
+++ b/post/post.c
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
 #include <watchdog.h>
 #include <post.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_POST_HOTKEYS_GPIO
+#include <asm/gpio.h>
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOGBUFFER
 #include <logbuff.h>
 #endif
@@ -68,6 +72,23 @@ int post_init_f (void)
  */
 int __post_hotkeys_pressed(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_POST_HOTKEYS_GPIO
+	int ret;
+	unsigned gpio = CONFIG_SYS_POST_HOTKEYS_GPIO;
+
+	ret = gpio_request(gpio, "hotkeys");
+	if (ret) {
+		printf("POST: gpio hotkey request failed\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	gpio_direction_input(gpio);
+	ret = gpio_get_value(gpio);
+	gpio_free(gpio);
+
+	return ret;
+#endif
+
 	return 0;	/* No hotkeys supported */
 }
 int post_hotkeys_pressed(void)
-- 
1.7.5.3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] post: use ARRAY_SIZE

[Mike Frysinger]

We've got a handy dandy macro already for calculating the number of
elements in an array, so use it.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
 post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c                     |    2 +-
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c                       |    4 +---
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c                         |    3 +--
 post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c                        |    4 +---
 post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c                         |    3 +--
 post/drivers/memory.c                         |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/andi.c                       |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c                        |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c                       |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/cr.c                         |   12 ++++--------
 post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/load.c                       |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/multi.c                      |    2 +-
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c                     |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c                     |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c                      |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c                      |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/store.c                      |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/three.c                      |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/threei.c                     |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/threex.c                     |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/two.c                        |    3 +--
 post/lib_powerpc/twox.c                       |    3 +--
 post/post.c                                   |    2 +-
 post/tests.c                                  |    2 +-
 25 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c b/post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c
index fc828b2..72224c6 100644
--- a/post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c
+++ b/post/board/lwmon/sysmon.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static sysmon_table_t sysmon_table[] =
     {"+ 5 V standby", "V", &sysmon_pic, NULL, NULL,
      100, 1000, 0, 6040, 0xFF, 0xC8, 0xDE, 0, 0xC8, 0xDE, 0, 0x7C},
 };
-static int sysmon_table_size = sizeof(sysmon_table) / sizeof(sysmon_table[0]);
+static int sysmon_table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(sysmon_table);
 
 static int conversion_done = 0;
 
diff --git a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c
index 43ea817..fcbb300 100644
--- a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c
+++ b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/ether.c
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ static int ctlr_list[][2] = { {CTLR_SCC, 1} };
 static int ctlr_list[][2] = { };
 #endif
 
-#define CTRL_LIST_SIZE (sizeof(ctlr_list) / sizeof(ctlr_list[0]))
-
 static struct {
 	void (*init) (int index);
 	void (*halt) (int index);
@@ -618,7 +616,7 @@ int ether_post_test (int flags)
 	ctlr_proc[CTLR_SCC].send = scc_send;
 	ctlr_proc[CTLR_SCC].recv = scc_recv;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < CTRL_LIST_SIZE; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctlr_list); i++) {
 		if (test_ctlr (ctlr_list[i][0], ctlr_list[i][1]) != 0) {
 			res = -1;
 		}
diff --git a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c
index db84dbe..4c1e2af 100644
--- a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c
+++ b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/spr.c
@@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ static struct
 	{826,	"MD_DBRAM1",	0x00000000,	0x00000000},
 };
 
-static int spr_test_list_size =
-		sizeof (spr_test_list) / sizeof (spr_test_list[0]);
+static int spr_test_list_size = ARRAY_SIZE(spr_test_list);
 
 int spr_post_test (int flags)
 {
diff --git a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c
index f351ac0..7a7a62a 100644
--- a/post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c
+++ b/post/cpu/mpc8xx/uart.c
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ static int ctlr_list[][2] =
 static int ctlr_list[][2] = { };
 #endif
 
-#define CTRL_LIST_SIZE (sizeof(ctlr_list) / sizeof(ctlr_list[0]))
-
 static struct {
 	void (*init) (int index);
 	void (*halt) (int index);
@@ -540,7 +538,7 @@ int uart_post_test (int flags)
 	ctlr_proc[CTLR_SCC].putc = scc_putc;
 	ctlr_proc[CTLR_SCC].getc = scc_getc;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < CTRL_LIST_SIZE; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctlr_list); i++) {
 		if (test_ctlr (ctlr_list[i][0], ctlr_list[i][1]) != 0) {
 			res = -1;
 		}
diff --git a/post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c b/post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c
index cb18b64..3f5e965 100644
--- a/post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c
+++ b/post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c
@@ -156,8 +156,7 @@ static struct {
 	{0x3f3,	"DBDR",		0x00000000,	0x00000000},
 };
 
-static int spr_test_list_size =
-		sizeof (spr_test_list) / sizeof (spr_test_list[0]);
+static int spr_test_list_size = ARRAY_SIZE(spr_test_list);
 
 int spr_post_test (int flags)
 {
diff --git a/post/drivers/memory.c b/post/drivers/memory.c
index 3f47449..4cca035 100644
--- a/post/drivers/memory.c
+++ b/post/drivers/memory.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ const unsigned long long otherpattern = 0x0123456789abcdefULL;
 static int memory_post_dataline(unsigned long long * pmem)
 {
 	unsigned long long temp64 = 0;
-	int num_patterns = sizeof(pattern)/ sizeof(pattern[0]);
+	int num_patterns = ARRAY_SIZE(pattern);
 	int i;
 	unsigned int hi, lo, pathi, patlo;
 	int ret = 0;
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/andi.c b/post/lib_powerpc/andi.c
index 52ec7c4..2791cd7 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/andi.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/andi.c
@@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_andi_s
 	0x80000000
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_andi_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_andi_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_andi_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_andi_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_andi_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_andi (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c b/post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c
index 5f6a3b9..ae5b72b 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/cmp.c
@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_cmp_s
 	0x04
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cmp_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cmp_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_cmp_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cmp_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cmp_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_cmp (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c b/post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c
index 1a2fc3d..4160a2a 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/cmpi.c
@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_cmpi_s
 	0x04
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cmpi_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cmpi_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_cmpi_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cmpi_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cmpi_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_cmpi (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/cr.c b/post/lib_powerpc/cr.c
index fbee6d5..ada7c7a 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/cr.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/cr.c
@@ -59,8 +59,7 @@ static ulong cpu_post_cr_table1[] =
     0xaaaaaaaa,
     0x55555555,
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size1 =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cr_table1) / sizeof (ulong);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size1 = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cr_table1);
 
 static struct cpu_post_cr_s2 {
     ulong xer;
@@ -76,8 +75,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_cr_s2 {
 	5
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size2 =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cr_table2) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_cr_s2);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size2 = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cr_table2);
 
 static struct cpu_post_cr_s3 {
     ulong cr;
@@ -99,8 +97,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_cr_s3 {
 	0x71234567
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size3 =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cr_table3) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_cr_s3);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size3 = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cr_table3);
 
 static struct cpu_post_cr_s4 {
     ulong cmd;
@@ -240,8 +237,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_cr_s4 {
 	0x0000ffff
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size4 =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_cr_table4) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_cr_s4);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_cr_size4 = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_cr_table4);
 
 int cpu_post_test_cr (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c b/post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c
index 23a3f30..b3f8deb 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/fpu/mul-subnormal-single-1.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int fpu_post_test_math7 (void)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < sizeof (expected) / sizeof (expected[0]); i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++)
 	{
 		tstmul (expected[i].p1, expected[i].p2, expected[i].res);
 		tstmul (expected[i].p2, expected[i].p1, expected[i].res);
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/load.c b/post/lib_powerpc/load.c
index 98d4373..49924f2 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/load.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/load.c
@@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_load_s
 	1
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_load_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_load_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_load_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_load_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_load_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_load (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/multi.c b/post/lib_powerpc/multi.c
index e42a7c0..5845616 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/multi.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/multi.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int cpu_post_test_multi (void)
 	    ASM_BLR,
 	};
 
-	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(src) / sizeof(src[0]); i ++)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(src); ++i)
 	{
 	    src[i] = i;
 	    dst[i] = 0;
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c
index fd628b3..15d96ac 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwimi.c
@@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_rlwimi_s
 	0xffaaffff
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwimi_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_rlwimi_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_rlwimi_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwimi_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_rlwimi_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_rlwimi (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c
index 88a28c6..a04ec52 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwinm.c
@@ -59,8 +59,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_rlwinm_s
 	0x0000ff00
    },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwinm_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_rlwinm_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_rlwinm_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwinm_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_rlwinm_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_rlwinm (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c
index 60bcb6d..764fe0c 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/rlwnm.c
@@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_rlwnm_s
 	0x0000ff00
    },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwnm_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_rlwnm_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_rlwnm_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_rlwnm_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_rlwnm_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_rlwnm (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c b/post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c
index be153ad..90a1e4d 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/srawi.c
@@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_srawi_s
 	0xf0000000
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_srawi_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_srawi_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_srawi_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_srawi_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_srawi_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_srawi (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/store.c b/post/lib_powerpc/store.c
index 1956f6b..441389c 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/store.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/store.c
@@ -156,8 +156,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_store_s
 	0xff
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_store_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_store_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_store_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_store_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_store_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_store (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/three.c b/post/lib_powerpc/three.c
index 7f8c1e2..4391386 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/three.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/three.c
@@ -155,8 +155,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_three_s
 	0x40
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_three_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_three_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_three_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_three_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_three_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_three (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/threei.c b/post/lib_powerpc/threei.c
index 31953f9..95b6322 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/threei.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/threei.c
@@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_threei_s
 	0xffff8000
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_threei_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_threei_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_threei_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_threei_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_threei_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_threei (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/threex.c b/post/lib_powerpc/threex.c
index 350a12a..7769218 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/threex.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/threex.c
@@ -125,8 +125,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_threex_s
 	0x1000
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_threex_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_threex_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_threex_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_threex_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_threex_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_threex (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/two.c b/post/lib_powerpc/two.c
index 2b11147..7f08880 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/two.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/two.c
@@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_two_s
 	~5
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_two_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_two_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_two_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_two_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_two_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_two (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/twox.c b/post/lib_powerpc/twox.c
index d6714f9..88140bf 100644
--- a/post/lib_powerpc/twox.c
+++ b/post/lib_powerpc/twox.c
@@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static struct cpu_post_twox_s
 	12
     },
 };
-static unsigned int cpu_post_twox_size =
-    sizeof (cpu_post_twox_table) / sizeof (struct cpu_post_twox_s);
+static unsigned int cpu_post_twox_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_post_twox_table);
 
 int cpu_post_test_twox (void)
 {
diff --git a/post/post.c b/post/post.c
index ecea1e1..7660224 100644
--- a/post/post.c
+++ b/post/post.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void post_get_flags (int *test_flags)
 			 POST_CRITICAL };
 	char *var[] = { "post_poweron", "post_normal", "post_slowtest",
 			"post_critical" };
-	int varnum = sizeof (var) / sizeof (var[0]);
+	int varnum = ARRAY_SIZE(var);
 	char list[128];			/* long enough for POST list */
 	char *name;
 	char *s;
diff --git a/post/tests.c b/post/tests.c
index 5f59fbb..71437b6 100644
--- a/post/tests.c
+++ b/post/tests.c
@@ -305,4 +305,4 @@ struct post_test post_list[] =
 #endif
 };
 
-unsigned int post_list_size = sizeof (post_list) / sizeof (struct post_test);
+unsigned int post_list_size = ARRAY_SIZE(post_list);
-- 
1.7.5.3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] post: new nor flash test

[Mike Frysinger]

This adds a simple flash test to automatically verify erasing,
writing, and reading of sectors.  The code is based on existing
Blackfin tests but generalized for everyone to use.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
 include/post.h        |    1 +
 post/drivers/Makefile |    2 +-
 post/drivers/flash.c  |  107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 post/tests.c          |   15 ++++++-
 4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 post/drivers/flash.c

diff --git a/include/post.h b/include/post.h
index c9ec2f4..19991de 100644
--- a/include/post.h
+++ b/include/post.h
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ extern int post_hotkeys_pressed(void);
 #define CONFIG_SYS_POST_BSPEC5		0x00100000
 #define CONFIG_SYS_POST_CODEC		0x00200000
 #define CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC		0x00400000
+#define CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH		0x00800000
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_POST */
 
diff --git a/post/drivers/Makefile b/post/drivers/Makefile
index 0d87ae0..85d6c03 100644
--- a/post/drivers/Makefile
+++ b/post/drivers/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/config.mk
 
 LIB	= libpostdrivers.o
 
-COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAS_POST)	+= i2c.o memory.o rtc.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAS_POST)	+= flash.o i2c.o memory.o rtc.o
 
 include $(TOPDIR)/post/rules.mk
diff --git a/post/drivers/flash.c b/post/drivers/flash.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..07eab33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/post/drivers/flash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Parallel NOR Flash tests
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2005-2011 Analog Devices Inc.
+ *
+ * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <malloc.h>
+#include <post.h>
+#include <flash.h>
+
+#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH
+
+/*
+ * This code will walk over the declared sectors erasing them,
+ * then programming them, then verifying the written contents.
+ * Possible future work:
+ *  - verify sectors before/after are not erased/written
+ *  - verify partial writes (e.g. programming only middle of sector)
+ *  - verify the contents of the erased sector
+ *  - better seed pattern than 0x00..0xff
+ */
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_NUM
+# define CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_NUM 0
+#endif
+#if CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_START >= CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_END
+# error "invalid flash block start/end"
+#endif
+
+extern flash_info_t flash_info[];
+
+static void *seed_src_data(void *ptr, ulong *old_len, ulong new_len)
+{
+	unsigned char *p;
+	ulong i;
+
+	p = ptr = realloc(ptr, new_len);
+	if (!ptr)
+		return ptr;
+
+	for (i = *old_len; i < new_len; ++i)
+		p[i] = i;
+
+	*old_len = new_len;
+
+	return ptr;
+}
+
+int flash_post_test(int flags)
+{
+	ulong len;
+	void *src;
+	int ret, n, n_start, n_end;
+	flash_info_t *info;
+
+	/* the output from the common flash layers needs help */
+	puts("\n");
+
+	len = 0;
+	src = NULL;
+	info = &flash_info[CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_NUM];
+	n_start = CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_START;
+	n_end = CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH_END;
+
+	for (n = n_start; n < n_end; ++n) {
+		ulong s_start, s_len, s_off;
+
+		s_start = info->start[n];
+		s_len = flash_sector_size(info, n);
+		s_off = s_start - info->start[0];
+
+		src = seed_src_data(src, &len, s_len);
+		if (!src) {
+			printf("malloc(%#lx) failed\n", s_len);
+			return 1;
+		}
+
+		printf("\tsector %i: %#lx +%#lx", n, s_start, s_len);
+
+		ret = flash_erase(info, n, n + 1);
+		if (ret) {
+			flash_perror(ret);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		ret = write_buff(info, src, s_start, s_len);
+		if (ret) {
+			flash_perror(ret);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		ret = memcmp(src, (void *)s_start, s_len);
+		if (ret) {
+			printf(" verify failed with %i\n", ret);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	free(src);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/post/tests.c b/post/tests.c
index 71437b6..bfb9cb5 100644
--- a/post/tests.c
+++ b/post/tests.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ extern int sysmon_post_test (int flags);
 extern int dsp_post_test (int flags);
 extern int codec_post_test (int flags);
 extern int ecc_post_test (int flags);
+extern int flash_post_test(int flags);
 
 extern int dspic_init_post_test (int flags);
 extern int dspic_post_test (int flags);
@@ -301,7 +302,19 @@ struct post_test post_list[] =
 	NULL,
 	NULL,
 	CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC
-    }
+    },
+#endif
+#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH
+    {
+	"Parallel NOR flash test",
+	"flash",
+	"This test verifies parallel flash operations.",
+	POST_RAM | POST_SLOWTEST | POST_MANUAL,
+	&flash_post_test,
+	NULL,
+	NULL,
+	CONFIG_SYS_POST_FLASH
+    },
 #endif
 };
 
-- 
1.7.5.3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] serial: implement common uart post test

[Mike Frysinger]

The current arch/driver specific UART posts basically boil down to setting
the UART to loop back mode, then reading and writing data.  If we ignore
the loop back part, the rest can be built upon the existing common serial
API.  So let's do just that.

First add a call back for serial drivers to implement loop back control.
Then write a post test that walks all of the serial drivers, puts them
into loop back mode, and verifies that reading/writing at all the diff
baud rates is OK.

If a serial driver doesn't support loop back mode (either it can't or
it hasn't done so yet), then skip it.  This should allow for people to
easily migrate to the new post test with existing serial drivers.

I haven't touched the few already existing uart post tests as I don't
the hardware or knowledge of converting them over.  So I've marked the
new test as weak which will allow the existing tests to override the
default until they are converted.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
 common/serial.c  |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/serial.h |    5 +++
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/serial.c b/common/serial.c
index 8ebf9a5..27c9b69 100644
--- a/common/serial.c
+++ b/common/serial.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 #include <common.h>
 #include <serial.h>
 #include <stdio_dev.h>
+#include <post.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
@@ -291,3 +293,91 @@ void serial_puts (const char *s)
 
 	serial_current->puts (s);
 }
+
+#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_UART
+static const int bauds[] = CONFIG_SYS_BAUDRATE_TABLE;
+
+/* Mark weak until post/cpu/.../uart.c migrate over */
+__weak
+int uart_post_test(int flags)
+{
+	unsigned char c;
+	int ret, saved_baud, b;
+	struct serial_device *saved_dev, *s;
+	bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
+
+	/* Save current serial state */
+	ret = 0;
+	saved_dev = serial_current;
+	saved_baud = bd->bi_baudrate;
+
+	for (s = serial_devices; s; s = s->next) {
+		/* If this driver doesn't support loop back, skip it */
+		if (!s->loop)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Test the next device */
+		serial_current = s;
+
+		ret = serial_init();
+		if (ret)
+			goto done;
+
+		/* Consume anything that happens to be queued */
+		while (serial_tstc())
+			serial_getc();
+
+		/* Enable loop back */
+		s->loop(1);
+
+		/* Test every available baud rate */
+		for (b = 0; b < ARRAY_SIZE(bauds); ++b) {
+			bd->bi_baudrate = bauds[b];
+			serial_setbrg();
+
+			/*
+			 * Stick to printable chars to avoid issues:
+			 *  - terminal corruption
+			 *  - serial program reacting to sequences and sending
+			 *    back random extra data
+			 *  - most serial drivers add in extra chars (like \r\n)
+			 */
+			for (c = 0x20; c < 0x7f; ++c) {
+				/* Send it out */
+				serial_putc(c);
+
+				/* Make sure it's the same one */
+				ret = (c != serial_getc());
+				if (ret) {
+					s->loop(0);
+					goto done;
+				}
+
+				/* Clean up the output in case it was sent */
+				serial_putc('\b');
+				ret = ('\b' != serial_getc());
+				if (ret) {
+					s->loop(0);
+					goto done;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+
+		/* Disable loop back */
+		s->loop(0);
+
+		/* XXX: There is no serial_uninit() !? */
+		if (s->uninit)
+			s->uninit();
+	}
+
+ done:
+	/* Restore previous serial state */
+	serial_current = saved_dev;
+	bd->bi_baudrate = saved_baud;
+	serial_reinit_all();
+	serial_setbrg();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/include/serial.h b/include/serial.h
index f21d961..2230ed0 100644
--- a/include/serial.h
+++ b/include/serial.h
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 #ifndef __SERIAL_H__
 #define __SERIAL_H__
 
+#include <post.h>
+
 #define NAMESIZE 16
 #define CTLRSIZE 8
 
@@ -15,6 +17,9 @@ struct serial_device {
 	int (*tstc) (void);
 	void (*putc) (const char c);
 	void (*puts) (const char *s);
+#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_UART
+	void (*loop) (int);
+#endif
 
 	struct serial_device *next;
 };
-- 
1.7.5.3

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <1309289196-5718-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> All of thse patches have been posted previously, and no one has
> given feedback, so here they are in a handy branch for you to pull.
> 
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
> 
>   Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
>   git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git post

Please stop reposting patches without reference or patch version or
change logs.

Please consider all these postings to be NAKed.

Please stick to the rules.  These apply to everbody, including you.
Even more so to you, as you have the experience and knowledge so that
you actually should be aware of how these things get done.


Also, after posting a patch series you MUST allow for review time.

Um... you are reposting old patches unchanged?  Now this is a really
stupid thing to do - please stop doing that.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Many companies that have made themselves dependent on [the  equipment
of  a  certain  major  manufacturer] (and in doing so have sold their
soul to the devil) will collapse under the sheer weight  of  the  un-
mastered complexity of their data processing systems.
          -- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 17:21:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Please stick to the rules.  These apply to everbody, including you.
> Even more so to you, as you have the experience and knowledge so that
> you actually should be aware of how these things get done.

you'll need to revise the wiki then as this really isnt how the linux workflow 
works.  i dont know which patches exactly have been posted, which had feedback 
and were revised, etc...  so i just posted the entire set that havent been 
merged fresh in case people missed things the first time around -- as is done 
on lkml.

since most likely nothing is going to get changed (again) in the next two 
weeks, i'll simply rebase the branches and send another pull request.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110629/442c2cce/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201106291930.48377.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 17:21:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Please stick to the rules.  These apply to everbody, including you.
> > Even more so to you, as you have the experience and knowledge so that
> > you actually should be aware of how these things get done.
> 
> you'll need to revise the wiki then as this really isnt how the linux workflow 
> works.  ...

I see no need to change anything, as the wiki represents how OUR
workflow works.

Please don't start applying random rules.

>    ...  i dont know which patches exactly have been posted, which had feedback 
> and were revised, etc...

Then please get a clue.  If you don't maintain your own copies of such
mails, then you can always refer to any of the mailing list archives.
And of course there is patchwork, which nicely collects all messages
that are related to a patch.

All you have to is looking there.

>                      ...  so i just posted the entire set that havent been
> merged fresh in case people missed things the first time around -- as is done 
> on lkml.

I don't care if this is done like this on lkml.  I consider it a
stupid thing to do, as there is no indication in this repost 1) that
this has been posted before, 2) to which mail thread a patch might
refer to, 3) if this is just an unchanged repost and 4) if you made
any changes, what these changes might be.

I will definitely not invest any time in trying to find this out.

We have clear rules how to post patches and updated versions of
patches, and I ask you again to stick to these rules.

Reposting patches - changed or unchanged - without any additional
commend will receive immediate NAKs.

> since most likely nothing is going to get changed (again) in the next two 
> weeks, i'll simply rebase the branches and send another pull request.

I will not pull any patches that have been NAKed, and these are.
And any similar repostings will be NAKed as well.


If you want to do something useful, then apply the original patches,
and make sure to reference these properly.

Thanks.

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."                    - Dave Bowman, 2001

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:29, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 17:21:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Please stick to the rules. ?These apply to everbody, including you.
>> > Even more so to you, as you have the experience and knowledge so that
>> > you actually should be aware of how these things get done.
>>
>> you'll need to revise the wiki then as this really isnt how the linux workflow
>> works. ?...
>
> I see no need to change anything, as the wiki represents how OUR
> workflow works.
>
> Please don't start applying random rules.

i'm not applying "random" rules.  the workflow is generally modeled
after the linux workflow, and the wiki explicitly has a section called
"Differences to Linux Development Process".  this common linux
workflow was not mentioned in the differences section.

> If you want to do something useful, then apply the original patches,
> and make sure to reference these properly.

except that they already are the original ones
-mike

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <BANLkTi=PoSnG11pLWC11Xv=HVO_pYQOR0A@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > If you want to do something useful, then apply the original patches,
> > and make sure to reference these properly.
> 
> except that they already are the original ones

Then why did you repost them?  This is completely stupid, and I never
want to see this again.

And why do you think the rules for posting patches don't apply to
you?

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow."

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:38, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > If you want to do something useful, then apply the original patches,
>> > and make sure to reference these properly.
>>
>> except that they already are the original ones
>
> Then why did you repost them?

i already explained why in the thread.

i just went through patchwork and d/l-ed the ones posted there and
compared to my local tree to come to the conclusion that everything
has already been posted (which is something i was not sure of when i
sent things out a few days ago).  it was a pita, but a requirement you
stipulated.

> And why do you think the rules for posting patches don't apply to
> you?

i never said that, and i already explained why i did what i did
-mike

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <BANLkTimMPtK0gyhRGammL0igYKsB0O2HCA@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> i just went through patchwork and d/l-ed the ones posted there and
> compared to my local tree to come to the conclusion that everything
> has already been posted (which is something i was not sure of when i
> sent things out a few days ago).  it was a pita, but a requirement you
> stipulated.

As a result of this action you could have come up with a branch that
includes all the stuff that "has already been posted".  There was no
need nor any benefit from reposting the stuff again.  On contrary, it
is just wasting time and resources.

> > And why do you think the rules for posting patches don't apply to
> > you?
> 
> i never said that, and i already explained why i did what i did

Then please follow the rules.  Don't repost other people's patches
unchanged; and if you change them, provide proper indication in the
Subject and a patch's change log.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A wise person makes his  own  decisions,  a  weak  one  obeys  public
opinion.                                           -- Chinese proverb

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:49, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i just went through patchwork and d/l-ed the ones posted there and
>> compared to my local tree to come to the conclusion that everything
>> has already been posted (which is something i was not sure of when i
>> sent things out a few days ago). ?it was a pita, but a requirement you
>> stipulated.
>
> As a result of this action you could have come up with a branch that
> includes all the stuff that "has already been posted". ?There was no
> need nor any benefit from reposting the stuff again. ?On contrary, it
> is just wasting time and resources.

i often post misc patches all over which frequently get forgotten, and
so i roll them up into a dedicated branch for you to pull.  and in the
past, you said you liked that.

so now you're saying that my only option is to ping multiple patches
over time until you notice.  that sounds like more of a waste.
-mike

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <BANLkTinWfOUUBM8oJRuTZpX2N6ADTZTZ+A@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> >> i just went through patchwork and d/l-ed the ones posted there and
> >> compared to my local tree to come to the conclusion that everything
> >> has already been posted (which is something i was not sure of when i
> >> sent things out a few days ago). =A0it was a pita, but a requirement you
> >> stipulated.
> >
> > As a result of this action you could have come up with a branch that
> > includes all the stuff that "has already been posted". =A0There was no
> > need nor any benefit from reposting the stuff again. =A0On contrary, it
> > is just wasting time and resources.
> 
> i often post misc patches all over which frequently get forgotten, and
> so i roll them up into a dedicated branch for you to pull.  and in the
> past, you said you liked that.

Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it.  But
we're talking about the _original_ patches.

> so now you're saying that my only option is to ping multiple patches
> over time until you notice.  that sounds like more of a waste.

You misunderstand.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward.

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it. ?But
> we're talking about the _original_ patches.

and that's what my serial/post/sf patches ended up being.  should i
change the status for them in patchwork from "rejected" to "new" ?
-mike

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <BANLkTimNnd7SS3K4ovEKNFV3TytGz6JzgQ@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it. =A0But
> > we're talking about the _original_ patches.
> 
> and that's what my serial/post/sf patches ended up being.  should i

You don't want to understand, right?  You posted _new_ patches.
There is a chance that these might actually be identical to any
previously posted ones, but my time is way too precious that I would
spend a single second on checking this, especially when you ignore
all rules (version marker in the Subject, change log in the comment
section).

> change the status for them in patchwork from "rejected" to "new" ?

Try it, if you really want to see how I react when someone really
p*sses me off.

I have already wasted way too much time on this stupid issue.  I do
not intend to continue this discussion.


Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 18:57, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it. =A0But
>> > we're talking about the _original_ patches.
>>
>> and that's what my serial/post/sf patches ended up being. ?should i
>
> You don't want to understand, right? ?You posted _new_ patches.
> There is a chance that these might actually be identical to any
> previously posted ones, but my time is way too precious that I would
> spend a single second on checking this, especially when you ignore
> all rules (version marker in the Subject, change log in the comment
> section).

and like i *already* said, i verified that the patches just posted
match the ones already posted in the past by downloading them from
patchwork and doing a diff on them.

> I have already wasted way too much time on this stupid issue. ?I do
> not intend to continue this discussion.

so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm
trying to find a way forward.  awesome.
-mike

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <BANLkTim2vo8vrSZWWxGnLf8N2_gqBHUVSQ@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm
> trying to find a way forward.  awesome.

It's awsome how you manage to continue to ignore the documented rules,
even after I explained them ten times to you.

You are wasting my time.


Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
It is the quality rather than the quantity that matters.
- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 B.C. - A.D. 65)

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday, July 01, 2011 00:36:59 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm
> > trying to find a way forward.  awesome.
> 
> It's awsome how you manage to continue to ignore the documented rules,
> even after I explained them ten times to you.

i'm not ignoring any rules.  you said you dont want dumps of patches that 
havent been changed and lack pointing back to previous sets.  fine.

you also said you only want pull requests of patches that match the patches 
previously posted to the list, and based on that you NAK-ed my pulls.  i then 
researched and clarified that all the pulls match exactly the patches that 
were in patchwork before the fresh dumps on June 28th.  pretend the patch 
dumps for these branches didnt happen on June 28th, and the pull requests 
would still be exactly the same.

yet you still refuse to take the pull requests and provide no reason as to 
why.  you only say that i'm "wasting your time" with no backing logic and no 
indication as to how to move forward.  i cant go back in time and unsend the 
patches that have already hit the list.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110701/fe005fa2/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201107011927.38666.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> i'm not ignoring any rules.  you said you dont want dumps of patches that 
> havent been changed and lack pointing back to previous sets.  fine.

http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions

> yet you still refuse to take the pull requests and provide no reason as to
> why.  you only say that i'm "wasting your time" with no backing logic and no 
> indication as to how to move forward.  i cant go back in time and unsend the 
> patches that have already hit the list.

Unsend patches?  I suggest you take a time-out of a few days, and
then re-read this thread.  If you still don't understand, then please
ask somebody else to explain it to you.

I give up here.


Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Unsichtbar macht sich die Dummheit, indem sie immer  gr??ere  Ausma?e
annimmt.                             -- Bertold Brecht: Der Tui-Roman

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Sunday, July 03, 2011 18:30:05 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i'm not ignoring any rules.  you said you dont want dumps of patches that
> > havent been changed and lack pointing back to previous sets.  fine.
> 
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions

which is irrelevant like i already said multiple times -- these patches arent 
updated

> > yet you still refuse to take the pull requests and provide no reason as
> > to why.  you only say that i'm "wasting your time" with no backing logic
> > and no indication as to how to move forward.  i cant go back in time and
> > unsend the patches that have already hit the list.
> 
> Unsend patches?  I suggest you take a time-out of a few days, and
> then re-read this thread.  If you still don't understand, then please
> ask somebody else to explain it to you.

you seem to be ignoring the points i'm making
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110704/5a147718/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201107042125.54555.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions
>
> which is irrelevant like i already said multiple times -- these patches arent 
> updated

So there is zero reason for resending.

> you seem to be ignoring the points i'm making

Wrong, twice.  First, you are not making any points.  You are just
repeating the same rogation.  Second, I'm on the verge of ignoring
you.

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I was playing poker the other night... with Tarot cards. I got a full
house and 4 people died.                              - Steven Wright

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 00:42:13 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versi
> > > ons
> > 
> > which is irrelevant like i already said multiple times -- these patches
> > arent updated
> 
> So there is zero reason for resending.

you already said that's what you want, and i already said "OK", which gets us 
back to what i already asked: if the pull requests reflect the old patches 
posted to the list before the resend on June 28th, then why cant they be 
changed from "rejected" to "new" ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110705/de5075ae/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201107050214.11960.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> you already said that's what you want, and i already said "OK", which gets us 
> back to what i already asked: if the pull requests reflect the old patches
> posted to the list before the resend on June 28th, then why cant they be 
> changed from "rejected" to "new" ?

Your bogus repostings are rejected, not the original patches.


Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Status quo. Latin for "the mess we're in."

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 05:59:56 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > you already said that's what you want, and i already said "OK", which
> > gets us back to what i already asked: if the pull requests reflect the
> > old patches posted to the list before the resend on June 28th, then why
> > cant they be changed from "rejected" to "new" ?
> 
> Your bogus repostings are rejected, not the original patches.

so since my pull requests are actually the original patches, i can go ahead 
and change them from "rejected" to "new" ?  or should i just send new pull 
requests ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110705/68cd2c5b/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201107051332.55970.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Your bogus repostings are rejected, not the original patches.
> 
> so since my pull requests are actually the original patches, i can go ahead
> and change them from "rejected" to "new" ?  or should i just send new pull 
> requests ?

This has already been answered.  You are wasting my time.  Stop it,
now.

This is my last message in this thread.  Try to get help elsewhere.
I got better things to do.

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A fanatic is a person who can't change his mind and won't change  the
subject.                                          - Winston Churchill

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 17:54:32 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Your bogus repostings are rejected, not the original patches.
> > 
> > so since my pull requests are actually the original patches, i can go
> > ahead and change them from "rejected" to "new" ?  or should i just send
> > new pull requests ?
> 
> This has already been answered.  You are wasting my time.  Stop it,
> now.

your logic makes no sense.  you say you are fine with the original patches, 
but i cant send pull requests of the original patches.  i guess i'll have to 
wait for you to pick the individual patches out of patchwork then.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110705/ef31a932/attachment.pgp 

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Mike Frysinger]

The following changes since commit 1d5e7fb403257d62f0f2419cb83fdf6b0f02f215:

  Prepare v2011.09 (2011-09-29 21:11:15 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git post

All have been posted to the list already.

Mike Frysinger (6):
      Blackfin: bf537-stamp: convert to gpio post hotkey
      Blackfin: post: drop custom test list
      Blackfin: bf537-stamp: drop uart/flash post tests
      Blackfin: post: generalize led/button tests with GPIOs
      Blackfin: bf537-stamp/bf548-ezkit: update POST flash block range
      Blackfin: uart: implement loop callback for post

 arch/blackfin/cpu/serial.c         |   40 ++++++
 arch/blackfin/include/asm/config.h |   18 +++
 arch/blackfin/lib/Makefile         |    2 +-
 arch/blackfin/lib/post.c           |   85 ++++++++++++
 arch/blackfin/lib/tests.c          |  250 ------------------------------------
 board/bf537-stamp/Makefile         |    2 +-
 board/bf537-stamp/post-memory.c    |   63 +---------
 board/bf537-stamp/post.c           |  174 -------------------------
 include/configs/bf537-stamp.h      |   11 ++-
 include/configs/bf548-ezkit.h      |   10 +-
 include/configs/bfin_adi_common.h  |    1 -
 post/tests.c                       |    2 +
 12 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 493 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/blackfin/lib/post.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/blackfin/lib/tests.c
 delete mode 100644 board/bf537-stamp/post.c

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git (post branch)

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <1317335329-24870-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 1d5e7fb403257d62f0f2419cb83fdf6b0f02f215:
> 
>   Prepare v2011.09 (2011-09-29 21:11:15 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
>   git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git post
> 
> All have been posted to the list already.
> 
> Mike Frysinger (6):
>       Blackfin: bf537-stamp: convert to gpio post hotkey
>       Blackfin: post: drop custom test list
>       Blackfin: bf537-stamp: drop uart/flash post tests
>       Blackfin: post: generalize led/button tests with GPIOs
>       Blackfin: bf537-stamp/bf548-ezkit: update POST flash block range
>       Blackfin: uart: implement loop callback for post
> 
>  arch/blackfin/cpu/serial.c         |   40 ++++++
>  arch/blackfin/include/asm/config.h |   18 +++
>  arch/blackfin/lib/Makefile         |    2 +-
>  arch/blackfin/lib/post.c           |   85 ++++++++++++
>  arch/blackfin/lib/tests.c          |  250 ------------------------------------
>  board/bf537-stamp/Makefile         |    2 +-
>  board/bf537-stamp/post-memory.c    |   63 +---------
>  board/bf537-stamp/post.c           |  174 -------------------------
>  include/configs/bf537-stamp.h      |   11 ++-
>  include/configs/bf548-ezkit.h      |   10 +-
>  include/configs/bfin_adi_common.h  |    1 -
>  post/tests.c                       |    2 +
>  12 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 493 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/blackfin/lib/post.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/blackfin/lib/tests.c
>  delete mode 100644 board/bf537-stamp/post.c

Applied, thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
One does not thank logic.
	-- Sarek, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4