From: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>, <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>, <malysagreg@gmail.com>,
<sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>, <philip.molloy@analog.com>,
<marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>, <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>,
<anshuld@ti.com>, <afd@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<n-francis@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>, <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Pad SPL binary to 8-byte alignment before DTB
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:38:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DFMMUHPP8BW8.3M5VVTPEB9IZL@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112101102.1417970-3-b-padhi@ti.com>
On Mon Jan 12, 2026 at 3:41 PM IST, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> The OMAP2 SPL linker script (also used for K3 platforms) currently uses
> a 4-byte alignment directive after the __u_boot_list section. This
> alignment directive only advances the location counter without padding
> the actual binary output.
>
> When objcopy extracts u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin, it includes only actual
> data, stopping at the last byte of __u_boot_list (e.g., 0x41c359fc),
> not an aligned address (e.g., 0x41c35a00). So, when the FIT image
> containing device trees is concatenated to the SPL binary, it gets
> appended at this unaligned file size, causing libfdt validation failure.
>
> To fix this, move the alignment directive into the __u_boot_list section
> itself and make it 8-byte aligned as per DT spec. This forces the linker
> to include padding as part of the section data, ensuring objcopy
> includes the padding bytes in the binary and the appended FIT image
> starts at an 8-byte aligned boundary.
>
> Reported-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/DFJ950O0QM0D.380U0N16ZO19E@ti.com
> Fixes: 0535e46d55d7 ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.7.2-35-g52f07dcca47c")
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> ---
> v2: Changelog:
> 1. Get rid of extra ALIGN() directive, replace it with a comment
> 2. Carry Reported-by, Closes and Fixes tag.
>
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260109190026.58464-3-b-padhi@ti.com/
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/u-boot-spl.lds | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/u-boot-spl.lds b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/u-boot-spl.lds
> index 3bb759d8a1c..5ad169a37b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/u-boot-spl.lds
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/u-boot-spl.lds
> @@ -35,9 +35,13 @@ SECTIONS
> . = ALIGN(4);
> __u_boot_list : {
> KEEP(*(SORT(__u_boot_list*)));
> + /*
> + * Ensure 8-byte alignment at the end of the last section before
> + * DTB is appended, to satisfy DT spec alignment requirements
> + */
> + . = ALIGN(8);
I wonder if there could be a better way to handle this constraint,
currently we have two major problems with this approach:
1. All platforms facing similar alignment issues would have to modify
their linker scripts.
2. The FDT only gets appended directly to SPL binary in cases of
CONFIG_SPL_SEPARATE_BSS. Otherwise we do (SPL binary + BSS + FDT) as per
the $(obj)/$(SPL_BIN)-dtb.bin make target. Which means BSS would have to
be 8-byte aligned as well as the SPL binary.
I wonder if we could have a new make target for say
u-boot-spl-nodtb-aligned.bin which is just (SPL binary + optionally BSS
+ padding for alignment) and at runtime we modify the fdt addr in gd to
point to the correctly aligned address?
> } >.sram
>
> - . = ALIGN(4);
> __image_copy_end = .;
> _end = .;
> _image_binary_end = .;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 10:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix TI DTB alignment issues with recent libfdt update Beleswar Padhi
2026-01-12 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scripts/Makefile.xpl: Align filtered DTB to 8-byte within multidtb.fit Beleswar Padhi
2026-01-12 14:39 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 17:25 ` Padhi, Beleswar
2026-01-12 21:57 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 22:03 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-12 23:53 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-13 10:25 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2026-01-13 13:27 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-13 15:00 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-13 16:38 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Pad SPL binary to 8-byte alignment before DTB Beleswar Padhi
2026-01-12 13:08 ` Anshul Dalal [this message]
2026-01-12 16:48 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-12 21:56 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 22:05 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-12 23:56 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-13 15:00 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-13 16:34 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-14 14:17 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-15 0:02 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-15 8:00 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2026-01-16 4:52 ` Anshul Dalal
2026-01-13 19:45 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-12 14:40 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 16:45 ` Tom Rini
2026-01-20 18:08 ` (subset) [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix TI DTB alignment issues with recent libfdt update Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DFMMUHPP8BW8.3M5VVTPEB9IZL@ti.com \
--to=anshuld@ti.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=b-padhi@ti.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=malysagreg@gmail.com \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=n-francis@ti.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=philip.molloy@analog.com \
--cc=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox