From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:07:40 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH: cmdcfg: 00/19] Introduce initial
	versions of new Command Config files.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:59:35 +0200."
	<20070612155935.62C69353A64@atlas.denx.de> 
References: <20070612155935.62C69353A64@atlas.denx.de> 
Message-ID: <E1Hy8uC-0001mH-QH@jdl.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

So, like, the other day Wolfgang Denk mumbled:
> In message <466EBA23.4030308@freescale.com> you wrote:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT
> > #undef CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT
> > #else
> > #define CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT 0
> > #endif
> 
> #define foo foo ??? Not that looks uterly strange to me...
> 
> > ... ( repeat for each CONFIG_CMD_x )
> 
> grrrghh....

I agree.

> > With this technique, you won't need to modify all of the source files that use
> > CONFIG_COMMANDS.
> 
> But we *do* want to modify all files to move them to using the new
> scheme.

And my follow up patch will series do it again too!

Thanks,
jdl