From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:47:49 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 00/30] Finally kill off CONFIG_COMMANDS
	andCONFIG_BOOTP_MASK
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:53:24 +0200."
	<46597312D56D2A47A3A6E9C1D0D9B7AEB0C622@kpladc0001.konzeptpark.intra> 
References: <E1I86bS-0004Iv-A4@jdl.com>
	<46597312D56D2A47A3A6E9C1D0D9B7AEB0C622@kpladc0001.konzeptpark.intra>
Message-ID: <E1I8IsP-0008UU-Lb@jdl.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

So, like, the other day "Carsten Schlote" mumbled:
> Hi
> 
> > After these patches are applied, one simply uses the symbols
> > CONFIG_CMD_* or CONFIG_BOOTP_* in order to select and enable=20
> > the corresponding features.  No one should use or reference=20
> > CONFIG_COMMANDS or CONFIG_BOOTP_MASK any longer.
> 
> This really simplifies my kconfig patch for 1.x branch, and should
> really help with the 2.x design.

Curious, that, isn't it? :-)

> I will check them later today. Maybe there some other issues, which
> could be cured by some monster patches :-)

That _so_ sounded like a different volunteer to me! :-)

> Thanks for doing all that work!

Most welcome.

We'll let that dust settle a bit now.  Anyone who can, I'd
encourage you to grab my repo, build it, and shake it down.

Or wait until it all hits WD's "testing" repo and, um, test it!

> Carsten

Thanks,
jdl