[U-Boot] [PATCH] sun5i: Add A13-OLinuXinoM support

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Hans,

On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:56:01 +0200, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 06/09/2014 08:50 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:49:37 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Tested-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Where does this patch come from? The source tree it applies to is not
> > that of mainline U-Boot. If this is actually an RFC that I should look
> > into, (as the PW state says), then which repository does it apply to?
> 
> This was posted by Tom as an add on patch to my:
> "[PATCH u-boot sunxi 00/12] sun4i (v2) + sun5i + pmic + emac support"
> 
> Series, which was a series on top of one of Ian's sun7i support
> series:
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-March/175656.html
> 
> In the mean time (as you know) Ians' series has gone upstream and
> I've continued working on the series in question, with Ian
> reviewing it. Actually I've just send you a pull-req with the
> bits of this series which are ready to go upstream. Which includes
> support for the A13-OLinuXinoM as part of the
> "sunxi: Add sun5i support" patch.

Thanks. Unfortunately, I had lost track of the dependencies -- which is
a live example of why patches with dependencies should mention them
explicitly after their commit message (not in it, though, as once
applied, the dependency info is not relevant any more), so that folks
like me can reconstruct the information. :) 

I'll process you patch series -- not "pull request", as I only pull
from other (ARM-related only) U-Boot repos :) -- in a few days, then
I'll handle Tom's patch.

> Regards,
> 
> Hans

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.