From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 22:49:45 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: add CONFIG_SUPPORT_TPL
In-Reply-To: <CAMhH57SH_ka21Xc+Cvc-ba9OSpzZZ1WaT+3vvgk1qRPD5HUyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1411636747-10276-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
	<1411636747-10276-3-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
	<E1XcsTo-0007rL-Ob@janus>
	<CAMhH57SH_ka21Xc+Cvc-ba9OSpzZZ1WaT+3vvgk1qRPD5HUyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E1Xd3bm-0002dZ-Bd@janus>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Masahiro,

On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 02:04:36 +0900, Masahiro YAMADA
<yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> 2014-10-11 17:56 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>:
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:19:07 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
> > <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> >
> >> CONFIG_TPL should not be enabled for boards that do not have TPL.
> >> CONFIG_SUPPORT_TPL introduced by this commit should be "select"ed
> >> by boards with TPL support and CONFIG_TPL should depend on it.
> >
> > Actually, I see no CONFIG_SUPPORT_TPL in the patch, only
> > HAVE_TPL_SUPPORT. The commit message should match the patch content on
> > this point, should it not?
> 
> 
> I am guessing you are seeing the old patch (v1) that has been already
> Superseded.
> 
> The newest of this patch is v3:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/397543/

My bad -- I'd missed this indeed.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.