public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: xypron.glpk@gmx.de, agraf@csgraf.de, sjg@chromium.org,
	u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [resent RFC 06/22] sata: call device_probe() after scanning
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:45:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVtLz+bqkFXO2J7x@enceladus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211004034430.41355-7-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:44:14PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Every time a sata bus/port is scanned and a new device is detected,
> we want to call device_probe() as it will give us a chance to run additional
> post-processings for some purposes.
> 
> In particular, support for creating partitions on a device will be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c   | 11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/ata/sata_mv.c    |  9 +++++++++
>  drivers/ata/sata_sil.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c b/drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c
> index 6d42548087b3..6a51c70d1170 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c
> @@ -1026,6 +1026,16 @@ int dwc_ahsata_scan(struct udevice *dev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = device_probe(bdev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		debug("Can't probe\n");
> +		/* TODO: undo create */
> +
> +		device_unbind(bdev);
> +
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +

Patches 2-6 seem to do the same thing for different subsystems.  I think
creating a function for that would make it easier. 

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c b/drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c
> index e44db0a37458..346e9298b4c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c
> @@ -982,6 +982,17 @@ static int fsl_ata_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>  			failed_number++;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> +
> +		ret = device_probe(bdev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			debug("Can't probe\n");
> +			ret = fsl_unbind_device(blk);

Apart from this exception I guess

> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			failed_number++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (failed_number == nr_ports)
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> index 003222d47be6..09b735779ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> @@ -1099,6 +1099,15 @@ static int sata_mv_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		ret = device_probe(bdev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			debug("Can't probe\n");
> +			/* TODO: undo create */
> +
> +			device_unbind(bdev);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		/* If we got here, the current SATA port was probed
>  		 * successfully, so set the probe status to successful.
>  		 */
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
> index dda712f42cb2..295f7ca72303 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil.c
> @@ -864,6 +864,18 @@ static int sil_pci_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>  			failed_number++;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> +
> +		ret = device_probe(bdev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			debug("Can't probe\n");
> +			ret = sil_unbind_device(blk);
> +			device_unbind(bdev);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			failed_number++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (failed_number == sata_info.maxport)
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-04 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04  3:44 [resent RFC 00/22] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to device model AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 01/22] part: call part_init() in blk_get_device_by_str() only for MMC AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 02/22] scsi: call device_probe() after scanning AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 03/22] usb: storage: " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 04/22] mmc: " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 05/22] nvme: " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 06/22] sata: " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04 18:45   ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2021-10-05  1:06     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-08  5:44       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 07/22] block: ide: " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 08/22] dm: blk: add UCLASS_PARTITION AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04 18:40   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-10-05  1:30     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 09/22] dm: blk: add a device-probe hook for scanning disk partitions AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 10/22] dm: blk: add read/write interfaces with udevice AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 11/22] efi_loader: disk: use udevice instead of blk_desc AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 12/22] dm: add a hidden link to efi object AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 13/22] efi_loader: remove !CONFIG_BLK code from efi_disk AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 14/22] efi_loader: disk: a helper function to create efi_disk objects from udevice AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04 18:50   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-10-05  1:37     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 15/22] dm: blk: call efi's device-probe hook AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 16/22] efi_loader: cleanup after efi_disk-dm integration AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 17/22] efi_loader: add efi_remove_handle() AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-12  8:16   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-10-13  0:55     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 18/22] efi_loader: efi_disk: a helper function to delete efi_disk objects AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 19/22] dm: blk: call efi's device-removal hook AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 20/22] efi_driver: align with efi_disk-dm integration AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 21/22] efi_driver: cleanup after " AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04  3:44 ` [resent RFC 22/22] efi_selftest: block device: adjust dp for a test disk AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04 14:47 ` [resent RFC 00/22] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to device model Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-10-04 18:07   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-10-05  2:27     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-05  2:14   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-10-04 23:45 ` Simon Glass

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVtLz+bqkFXO2J7x@enceladus \
    --to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox