Re: [PATCH 0/6] patman: Small fixes plus remove --no-tree from checkpatch for linux

Brian Norris
2022-06-30T22:18:57Z

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:08:03PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The whole point of this series is really to make it so that when we're
> using patman for sending Linux patches that we don't pass "--no-tree"
> to checkpatch. While doing that, though, I found a number of bugs
> including an explanation about why recent version of patman have been
> yelling about "tags" when used with Linux even though Linux is
> supposed to have "process_tags" defaulted to False.

Awesome, I've been annoyed by the 'tags' thing, and just go used to
using --no-tags. Glad to see you're fixing it.

For the whole series:

Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

As noted, my brain isn't working so well on patch 6. But for patches 1-5
(modulo a small nit on 4):

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>