From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cmd: replace efi_create_handle/add_protocol with InstallMultipleProtocol
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:38:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz6GBJ2mHrakY0Pp@hera> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62e539e4-6c51-b457-5c64-37f71770d3aa@gmx.de>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:26:37AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/6/22 03:53, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:26:02PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > In general handles should only be deleted if the last remaining protocol
> > > is removed. Instead of explicitly calling
> > > efi_create_handle -> efi_add_protocol -> efi_delete_handle which blindly
> > > removes all protocols from a handle before removing it, use
> > > InstallMultiple/UninstallMultiple which adheres to the EFI spec and only
> > > deletes a handle if there are no additional protocols present
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > cmd/bootefi.c | 13 ++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > > index 3041873afbbc..4ab68868cc7e 100644
> > > --- a/cmd/bootefi.c
> > > +++ b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > > @@ -509,12 +509,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_run_image(void *source_buffer, efi_uintn_t source_size)
> > > * Make sure that device for device_path exist
> > > * in load_image(). Otherwise, shell and grub will fail.
> > > */
> > > - ret = efi_create_handle(&mem_handle);
> > > - if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > > - goto out;
> > > -
> > > - ret = efi_add_protocol(mem_handle, &efi_guid_device_path,
> > > - file_path);
> > > + ret = efi_install_multiple_protocol_interfaces(&mem_handle,
> > > + &efi_guid_device_path,
> > > + file_path, NULL);
> >
> > nitpick: NULL -> NULL, NULL
> > UEFI spec seems to require "A variable argument list containing pairs of
> > protocol GUIDs and protocol interfaces" even if a protocol interface won't be
> > used with GUID as NULL.
>
> The spec also has:
> "The pairs of arguments are removed in order from the variable argument
> list until a NULL protocol GUID value is found."
>
> This is what a calls inside EDK II looks like:
>
> Status = CoreInstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (
> &mDecompressHandle,
> &gEfiDecompressProtocolGuid,
> &gEfiDecompress,
> NULL
> );
>
> gBS->UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (
> Controller,
> &gEfiCallerIdGuid,
> AtaBusDriverData,
> NULL
> );
>
> So I am happy with a single NULL here.
>
> >
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> >
> > > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > > goto out;
> > > msg_path = file_path;
> > > @@ -542,7 +539,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_run_image(void *source_buffer, efi_uintn_t source_size)
> > > ret = do_bootefi_exec(handle, load_options);
> > >
> > > out:
> > > - efi_delete_handle(mem_handle);
> > > + efi_uninstall_multiple_protocol_interfaces(mem_handle,
> > > + &efi_guid_device_path,
> > > + file_path, NULL);
>
> We have installed a lot more protocols. The binary may have installed
> additional protocols. Consider the case of a boottime driver. To delete
> the handle we would have to remove all installed protocols.
>
> UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() may fail if one of the protocols
> was opened with ByDriver or ByChildcontroller. The return value has to
> be considered before freeing file_path.
Ok I'll fix it in v2
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > > efi_free_pool(file_path);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
>
Thanks
/Ilias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 15:26 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Clean up protocol installation API Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-05 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] efi_loader: define internal implementations of install/uninstallmultiple Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-06 1:49 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-10-06 3:02 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-10-06 7:37 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-06 10:41 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-05 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cmd: replace efi_create_handle/add_protocol with InstallMultipleProtocol Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-06 1:53 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-10-06 2:26 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-10-06 7:38 ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2022-10-06 9:43 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-10-06 1:34 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Clean up protocol installation API AKASHI Takahiro
2022-10-06 6:55 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-10-06 9:54 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz6GBJ2mHrakY0Pp@hera \
--to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox