From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63056D3B7F6 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7A789A0E; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:00:20 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=andestech.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id DA80189A08; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:00:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from Atcsqr.andestech.com (60-248-80-70.hinet-ip.hinet.net [60.248.80.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91AF89A06 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:00:15 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=andestech.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ycliang@andestech.com Received: from mail.andestech.com (ATCPCS34.andestech.com [10.0.1.134]) by Atcsqr.andestech.com with ESMTPS id 4AP9xupx049734 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:59:56 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from ycliang@andestech.com) Received: from swlinux02 (10.0.15.183) by ATCPCS34.andestech.com (10.0.1.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:59:57 +0800 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:59:57 +0800 From: Leo Liang To: Thomas Bonnefille CC: Peng Fan , Jaehoon Chung , "Tom Rini" , Rick Chen , Kongyang Liu , Thomas Petazzoni , =?utf-8?Q?Miqu=C3=A8l?= Raynal , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] riscv: dts: sophgo: add device tree for LicheeRV Nano Message-ID: References: <20241112-licheerv-nano-v1-0-bf75d1eb560e@bootlin.com> <20241112-licheerv-nano-v1-2-bf75d1eb560e@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (e0e92c31) (2023-03-25) X-Originating-IP: [10.0.15.183] X-ClientProxiedBy: ATCPCS33.andestech.com (10.0.1.100) To ATCPCS34.andestech.com (10.0.1.134) X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: Atcsqr.andestech.com 4AP9xupx049734 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 09:35:32PM +0100, Thomas Bonnefille wrote: > [EXTERNAL MAIL] > > On Mon Nov 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM CET, Leo Liang wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Thomas Bonnefille wrote: > > > [EXTERNAL MAIL] > > > > > > Import a slightly modified version of the LicheeRV Nano and SG2002 > > > device trees from the Linux Kernel. The current supported IPs are UART, > > > MMC, Timer, PLIC and CLINT. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/dts/Makefile | 1 + > > > arch/riscv/dts/sg2002-licheerv-nano-b.dts | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/riscv/dts/sg2002.dtsi | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Could we switch to use OF_UPSTREAM ? > > > > Hello Leo, > > Thank you for your review, I have a question though. > > The LicheeRV Nano device tree isn't upstreamed yet. It's just in the > Sophgo SoC maintainer tree and should be merged in v6.13 so in ~10 weeks. > Can I keep it out of dts/upstream for the moment or should I merge it by > hand before ? Hi Thomas, Got it! So there should be a follow-up patch that switch to OF_UPSTREAM once the upstream LicheeRV Nano DTS is settled, right? I can take this patch as is for now. Thanks! Best regards, Leo