public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@linaro.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
	Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] Boot var automatic management for removable medias
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 16:55:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG9oznUmO8eG5l1X@hera> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523191819.80258-2-raymond.mao@linaro.org>

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:18:20PM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
> Changes for complying to EFI spec §3.5.1.1
> 'Removable Media Boot Behavior'.
> Boot variables can be automatically generated during a removable
> media is probed. At the same time, unused boot variables will be
> detected and removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2
> - Ignore EFI_NOT_FOUND returned from
>   efi_bootmgr_update_media_device_boot_option which means no boot
>   options scanned.
> Changes in v3
> - Split the patch into moving and renaming functions and
>   individual patches for each changed functionality
> Changes in v4
> - Revert the change of introducing a bool parameter when updating
>   the boot option. Use short-form of device path by default
>
>  lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c         |  7 +++++++
>  lib/efi_loader/efi_variable.c     | 10 +++++++++-
>  lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> index d2256713a8..ca5f07f2ec 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> @@ -687,6 +687,13 @@ int efi_disk_probe(void *ctx, struct event *event)
>  			return -1;
>  	}
>
> +	/* only do the boot option management when UEFI sub-system is initialized */
> +	if (efi_obj_list_initialized == EFI_SUCCESS) {
> +		ret = efi_bootmgr_update_media_device_boot_option();
> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS && ret != EFI_NOT_FOUND)
> +			return -1;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable.c
> index be95ed44e6..fe71144358 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable.c
> @@ -476,6 +476,14 @@ efi_status_t efi_init_variables(void)
>  			log_err("Invalid EFI variable seed\n");
>  	}
>
> +	ret = efi_init_secure_state();
> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +		return ret;
>
> -	return efi_init_secure_state();
> +	/* update boot option management after variable service initialized */
> +	ret = efi_bootmgr_update_media_device_boot_option();
> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS && ret != EFI_NOT_FOUND)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return EFI_SUCCESS;
>  }
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c
> index dfef18435d..2995d4a583 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c
> @@ -748,5 +748,10 @@ efi_status_t efi_init_variables(void)
>  	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>  		return ret;
>
> +	/* update boot option management after variable service initialized */
> +	ret = efi_bootmgr_update_media_device_boot_option();
> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS && ret != EFI_NOT_FOUND)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return EFI_SUCCESS;

Instead of having to add identical code in the variable init code why dont
we add this in efi_setup.c, right under the efi_init_variables() call?

Thanks
/Ilias
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23 19:18 [PATCH v4 1/3] Move bootorder and bootoption apis to lib Raymond Mao
2023-05-23 19:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] Boot var automatic management for removable medias Raymond Mao
2023-05-25 13:55   ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2023-05-25 16:42     ` Raymond Mao
2023-05-25 19:07       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-05-23 19:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] Load option with short device path for boot vars Raymond Mao
2023-05-25  7:12   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-05-26  6:25     ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-05-26  8:18       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-05-26  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Move bootorder and bootoption apis to lib Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-05-26 15:41   ` Raymond Mao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZG9oznUmO8eG5l1X@hera \
    --to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=masahisa.kojima@linaro.org \
    --cc=raymond.mao@linaro.org \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox