From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, pbrobinson@redhat.com,
joe.hershberger@ni.com, rfried.dev@gmail.com, trini@konsulko.com,
goldsimon@gmx.de, lwip-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 11/13] net/lwip: connection between cmd and lwip apps
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 21:12:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNKFq07QJwh/zzBU@hades> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD8XO3bQmN0Dzp3gScPTUdgJ9OVEkdX0JsAopA9kbYzivHXwEA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Maxim
[...]
> > > +static int lwip_empty_tmo(void) { return 0; };
> > > +int (*ulwip_tmo)(void) = lwip_empty_tmo;
> > > +void ulwip_set_tmo(int (*tmo)(void))
> > > +{
> > > + ulwip_tmo = tmo;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ulwip_clear_tmo(void)
> > > +{
> > > + ulwip_tmo = lwip_empty_tmo;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ulwip_timeout_handler(void)
> > > +{
> > > + eth_halt();
> > > + ulwip_tmo();
> > > + net_set_state(NETLOOP_FAIL); /* we did not get the reply */
> >
> > I am not sure what I am reading here. You use callbacks a few lines above
> > to set a timeout function. But only set it for dhcp. On top of that the
> > function for DHCP has a case for a *successful* asignment of ip addresses.
> > Why are we setting the state to fail? And why are we complicating this by
> > assigning and removing callbacks if it's only used for dhcp?
> >
> >
> I need two time out callbacks here:
> 1. Trap rx polling loop if lwip application works too long. It is used when
> code goes to net_loop() code to poll rx packets
> and nobody interrupts this loop. This timeout is used for all cmds (lwip
> apps).
>
> 2. Trap lwip application after specific timeout and then check some state.
> That is case for DHCP, where LWIP DHCP does not have
> callback for changing state. And I need to know when to stop polling loop.
Yes but is there a reason to reassing those callback to a function ptr?
Just define them and use them
[...]
> > > + ret = ulwip_dhcp();
> > > +
> > > + net_set_timeout_handler(2000UL, ulwip_timeout_handler);
> > > +
> > > + ulwip_loop();
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_TFTPBOOT)) {
> > > + ulwip_clear_tmo();
> > > +
> > > + filename = env_get("bootfile");
> > > + if (!filename) {
> > > + printf("no bootfile\n");
> > > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> >
> > Why is this a failure? You just have the tftp command enabled but dont
> > want to download anything
> >
> > thanks, if dhcp did not return filename, but only IP, then nothing to
> download. It's not an error.
Yes but downloading a file is not mandatory, it depends on a DHCP option. If you
want to emulate this behaviour, you need to fail only if 'bootfile' is set but
cant be downloaded.
>
>
> > > + }
> > > +
Regards
/Ilias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 14:06 [PATCHv5 00/13] net/lwip: add lwip library for the network stack Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 01/13] net/lwip: add doc/develop/net_lwip.rst Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 02/13] net/lwip: integrate lwip library Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-03 14:18 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 03/13] net/lwip: implement dns cmd Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 04/13] net/lwip: implement dhcp cmd Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-03 6:26 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-03 14:34 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 05/13] net/lwip: implement tftp cmd Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-03 6:42 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-10 11:28 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-10 19:23 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 06/13] net/lwip: implement wget cmd Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-03 6:48 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-03 14:59 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 07/13] net/lwip: implement ping cmd Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-03 9:32 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-03 15:25 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 08/13] net/lwip: add lwip configuration configuration Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 09/13] net/lwip: implement lwip port to u-boot Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-03 16:21 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-08 10:07 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-08 17:54 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 10/13] net/lwip: update .gitignore with lwip Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-03 6:01 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 11/13] net/lwip: connection between cmd and lwip apps Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-03 8:56 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-08-08 12:19 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-08 18:12 ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2023-08-09 19:29 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 12/13] net/lwip: replace original net commands with lwip Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 21:31 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-08 14:05 ` Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-08 17:54 ` Simon Glass
2023-08-02 14:06 ` [PATCHv5 13/13] net/lwip: drop old net/wget Maxim Uvarov
2023-08-02 14:19 ` Maxim Uvarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNKFq07QJwh/zzBU@hades \
--to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=goldsimon@gmx.de \
--cc=joe.hershberger@ni.com \
--cc=lwip-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=maxim.uvarov@linaro.org \
--cc=pbrobinson@redhat.com \
--cc=rfried.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox