[PULL] u-boot-riscv/master

Dimitri John Ledkov
2021-05-07T14:21:13Z

Hi,

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:42 AM Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:09:43AM +0800, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:06:33AM +0800, Leo Liang wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > CI result: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7400
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 8ddaf943589756442bba21e5be645cd47526d82b:
> > >
> > > Merge tag 'dm-pull-29apr21' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm (2021-04-29 21:03:38 -0400)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv.git
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 91e4b7516d84cefab7324765b3c8d6a909185ce2:
> > >
> > > cmd/exception: support ebreak exception on RISC-V (2021-05-05 16:13:12 +0800)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Dylan Jhong (1):
> > > atcspi200: Add timeout mechanism in spi_xfer()
> > >
> > > Green Wan (2):
> > > riscv: cpu: Add callback to init each core
> > > riscv: cpu: fu740: clear feature disable CSR
> > >
> > > Heinrich Schuchardt (1):
> > > cmd/exception: support ebreak exception on RISC-V
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/cpu/start.S | 4 ++++
> > > cmd/riscv/exception.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > doc/usage/exception.rst | 3 +++
> > > drivers/spi/atcspi200_spi.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Please note that currently
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=20174
> > shows 55 patches. Most of them have been posted long enough that I
> > would expect them to be applied if there's no further feedback. Can you
> > please take a look? Thanks!
> >
>
> No problem, sorry for the delay!
>
> Two quick questions.
>
> Some of the patches delegated to Andes do not own a RISC-V tag but rather clk or driver etc.
> Do you mind if we pull them through RISC-V tree?
>
> And for these patches,
> do you prefer them pulled into this release or for-next branch?

Although https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210421114201.57994-1-xnox at ubuntu.com/
is not strictly for riscv64 it does prevent me from using the same
Ubuntu rootfs for riscv boards or qemu. I would appreciate it if it
could be pulled in via qemu or riscv maintainers.

--
Regards,

Dimitri.