U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	trini@konsulko.com, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:05:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_ZpeSFEyJan2mZB@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deb7ccd0-978b-4b97-bf67-de540dc02fe6@linaro.org>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/8/25 15:46, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 4/7/25 15:28, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add U-Boot override for RB1 to for USB in host mode as OTG mode isn't
> > > > supported. Also, disable sdhc_2 as it's currently not supported, sdhc_1
> > > > works fine though.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> > > >    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > >    create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 00000000000..1e136ee405a
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +
> > > > +/* This is usually OTG but U-Boot doesn't support that properly */
> > > > +&usb_dwc3 {
> > > > +	dr_mode = "host";
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/* SDHC_2 isn't supported in U-Boot as of now */
> > > 
> > > I'd rather avoid disabling this here, I guess it's just missing clocks and
> > > regulators which doesn't justify modifying DT. An error that mmc1 couldn't
> > > be enabled seems fine to me?
> > 
> > I totally echo with your thinking that we should avoid modifying DT but
> > at the same point we shouldn't enable peripherals in U-Boot which throws
> > errors. It's also possible that U-Boot misconfiguring mmc1 which might
> 
> I disagree, DT isn't enabling or disabling peripherals, it's describing
> hardware.

It would be helpful if you can describe the use-case for "status"
property then.

> U-Boot lacking proper support for that hardware isn't a good
> justification to disable it. Especially since you might boot Linux with the
> same DT and now have no working sdcard for seemingly no reason.

We shouldn't use same DT unless both U-Boot and Linux support that
without modifications and *not* being in a broken state. The similar argument
holds true for USB OTG mode too.

> 
> An error in U-Boot is exactly the behaviour we want to see, masking it only
> created confusion.> turn as a problem for later stages.

IMO, our first priority should be to fix U-Boot issues and then see if
we can use unmodified DT.

> > 
> > I have been totally working with a remote lab to fix issues on RB1. I
> > will soon get one on my desk then I will be able to fix mmc1 too.
> 
> In that case we can surely land the proper fixes for 2025.07 anyway, so I'd
> just keep the errors until then.

Fixing errors in mainline will help other people confidence who are
trying to boot U-Boot on RB1. If you still have a strong preference to
keep SD card support enabled in broken state then I can live with that
until I fix it for real.

-Sumit

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 13:28 [PATCH 0/2] RB1 fixes Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1 Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 12:17   ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-08 13:46     ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 14:43       ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-09 12:35         ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-04-09 17:23           ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-10  8:11             ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] qcom_defconfig: Disable MMC HS200 mode support Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 14:30   ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-08  4:29     ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 12:13       ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-09 12:36         ` Sumit Garg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] RB1 fixes Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1 Sumit Garg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_ZpeSFEyJan2mZB@sumit-X1 \
    --to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
    --cc=caleb.connolly@linaro.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox