public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Landau <kapheine@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: More 5282 network issues-development
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:51:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a04f56da050412105153de0e21@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504121014.42518.ngustavson@emacinc.com>

> FEC_STRUCTURE
> This seems to be the subject of some debate, but looking over it, the fec
> structure in the CVS does appear to be incorrect.
> For instance, it only defines a single hash table
>  uint fec_hash_table_high; /* upper 32-bits of hash table  */
>  uint fec_hash_table_low; /* lower 32-bits of hash table  */]
> Even thought the datasheet clearly indicates that there are two. How could
> this possibly be correct?
> Zach's structure does appear to be the correct one, and in fact is the only
> one I've had any success with at all.

There's no debate.  The structure is wrong.  Wolfgang has requested a
patch be submitted for it.  I haven't had time to do it, but go for it
if you do.


> SPEED:
> The new code can download intact linux images with tftp, but it only works if
> ET_DEBUG is enabled. If it's not everything seems to run too fast and the
> code chokes itself(sends out big bursts of packets and then doesn't respond
> to the big bursts it gets back). How can I tell it to slow down and wait for
> responses without debug statements? Is there a place for this?

As you mentioned in your next email, this is probably an issue with
the 5282 timer.  The code I sent to you works for me, although I will
not claim it is completely correct.  I mucked around a bit with net.c
while debugging, so there may or may not be things I changed in there
that make it work.  That isn't to say that net.c was wrong, but rather
that my timer code may have been acting differently from how net.c
expects.

> 
> ICMP:
> Once the TFTP transaction gags, my tftpd server turns around and starts trying
> to ping the client to see if it's alive, but it never responds. Should it be?
> does the stack support this?

I am able to use the 'ping' command once networking was setup.  This
is probably directly related to the timer issue.

-- 
Zachary P. Landau <kapheine@gmail.com>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-12 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-12 15:14 [U-Boot-Users] More 5282 network issues-development NZG
2005-04-12 15:51 ` [U-Boot-Users] " NZG
2005-04-12 20:05   ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-12 17:51 ` Zachary Landau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a04f56da050412105153de0e21@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kapheine@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox