From: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
To: Nate Drude <Nate.D@variscite.com>,
"u-boot@lists.denx.de" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Cc: "alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com" <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>,
"joe.hershberger@ni.com" <joe.hershberger@ni.com>,
"rfried.dev@gmail.com" <rfried.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] phy: adin: remove broken support for adi,phy-mode-override
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 11:51:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a468ae1b-5471-998b-df98-c7d447befb6a@solid-run.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <305de6cf1db72f24deb78ae1714dcb6ed2f7da7e.camel@variscite.com>
Hi Nate,
Am 02.05.22 um 16:25 schrieb Nate Drude:
> Hi Josua,
>
> On Sun, 2022-05-01 at 15:41 +0300, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> The adin_get_phy_mode_override function does not compile, because it
>> is
>> missing both declaration and implementation of
>> phy_get_interface_by_name.
>>
>> Remove the whole function for now, since the missing implementation
>> is
>> not included in mainline Linux - and thus can not be copied.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/adin.c | 34 ----------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/adin.c b/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
>> index cff841ab3d..2433e76fea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
>> @@ -94,35 +94,6 @@ static u32 adin_get_reg_value(struct phy_device
>> *phydev,
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * adin_get_phy_mode_override - Get phy-mode override for adin PHY
>> - *
>> - * The function gets phy-mode string from property 'adi,phy-mode-
>> override'
>> - * and return its index in phy_interface_strings table, or -1 in
>> error case.
>> - */
>> -int adin_get_phy_mode_override(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> -{
>> - ofnode node = phy_get_ofnode(phydev);
>> - const char *phy_mode_override;
>> - const char *prop_phy_mode_override = "adi,phy-mode-override";
>> - int override_interface;
>> -
>> - phy_mode_override = ofnode_read_string(node,
>> prop_phy_mode_override);
>> - if (!phy_mode_override)
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> - debug("%s: %s = '%s'\n",
>> - __func__, prop_phy_mode_override, phy_mode_override);
>> -
>> - override_interface =
>> phy_get_interface_by_name(phy_mode_override);
>> -
>> - if (override_interface < 0)
>> - printf("%s: %s = '%s' is not valid\n",
>> - __func__, prop_phy_mode_override,
>> phy_mode_override);
>> -
>> - return override_interface;
>> -}
>> -
>> static u16 adin_ext_read(struct phy_device *phydev, const u32
>> regnum)
>> {
>> u16 val;
>> @@ -148,11 +119,6 @@ static int adin_config_rgmii_mode(struct
>> phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> u16 reg_val;
>> u32 val;
>> - int phy_mode_override = adin_get_phy_mode_override(phydev);
>> -
>> - if (phy_mode_override >= 0) {
>> - phydev->interface = (phy_interface_t)
>> phy_mode_override;
>> - }
>>
>> reg_val = adin_ext_read(phydev, ADIN1300_GE_RGMII_CFG);
>>
> The patch that introduced adin_get_phy_mode_override was tested against
> the U-Boot master branch. Unfortunately, phy_get_interface_by_name was
> removed just a few days before by:
> https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/commit/123ca114e07ecf28aa2538748d733e2b22d8b8b5
:(
> Can we fix adin_get_phy_mode_override instead of removing it?
I will take a look in the coming days and see if I understand how to fix
this.
I don't really mind if we fix it, or remove it - removing was the faster
way getting my patch-set out of course ...
> We can
> implement part of ofnode_read_phy_mode. This needs to be tested, but
> for example:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/adin.c b/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
> index cff841ab3d..6a05b9fd05 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/adin.c
> @@ -100,27 +100,28 @@ static u32 adin_get_reg_value(struct phy_device
> *phydev,
> * The function gets phy-mode string from property 'adi,phy-mode-
> override'
> * and return its index in phy_interface_strings table, or -1 in error
> case.
> */
> -int adin_get_phy_mode_override(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +phy_interface_t adin_get_phy_mode_override(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> ofnode node = phy_get_ofnode(phydev);
> const char *phy_mode_override;
> const char *prop_phy_mode_override = "adi,phy-mode-override";
> - int override_interface;
> + int i;
>
> phy_mode_override = ofnode_read_string(node,
> prop_phy_mode_override);
> +
> if (!phy_mode_override)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
>
> debug("%s: %s = '%s'\n",
> __func__, prop_phy_mode_override, phy_mode_override);
>
> - override_interface =
> phy_get_interface_by_name(phy_mode_override);
> + for (i = 0; i < PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MAX; i++)
> + if (!strcmp(phy_mode_override,
> phy_interface_strings[i]))
> + return i;
>
> - if (override_interface < 0)
> - printf("%s: %s = '%s' is not valid\n",
> - __func__, prop_phy_mode_override,
> phy_mode_override);
> + debug("%s: Invalid PHY interface '%s'\n", __func__,
> phy_mode_override);
>
> - return override_interface;
> + return PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
> }
>
> static u16 adin_ext_read(struct phy_device *phydev, const u32 regnum)
> @@ -148,10 +149,10 @@ static int adin_config_rgmii_mode(struct
> phy_device *phydev)
> {
> u16 reg_val;
> u32 val;
> - int phy_mode_override = adin_get_phy_mode_override(phydev);
> + phy_interface_t phy_mode_override =
> adin_get_phy_mode_override(phydev);
>
> - if (phy_mode_override >= 0) {
> - phydev->interface = (phy_interface_t)
> phy_mode_override;
> + if (phy_mode_override != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA) {
> + phydev->interface = phy_mode_override;
> }
>
> reg_val = adin_ext_read(phydev, ADIN1300_GE_RGMII_CFG);
>
> Thanks,
> Nate
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-04 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-01 12:41 [PATCH 0/5] mx6cuboxi: add eth support for SoMs revision 1.9+ Josua Mayer
2022-05-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] phy: adin: remove broken support for adi, phy-mode-override Josua Mayer
2022-05-02 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] phy: adin: remove broken support for adi,phy-mode-override Nate Drude
2022-05-04 8:51 ` Josua Mayer [this message]
2022-05-04 12:46 ` Nate Drude
2022-05-05 15:30 ` Josua Mayer
2022-05-08 9:34 ` Josua Mayer
2022-05-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] phy: adin: add support for clock output Josua Mayer
2022-05-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sr-som: add support for alternate phy addresses Josua Mayer
2022-05-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] mx6cuboxi: fixup dtb ethernet phy nodes before booting an OS Josua Mayer
2022-05-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] mx6cuboxi: enable driver for adin1300 phy Josua Mayer
2022-05-19 8:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] mx6cuboxi: add eth support for SoMs revision 1.9+ Josua Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a468ae1b-5471-998b-df98-c7d447befb6a@solid-run.com \
--to=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=Nate.D@variscite.com \
--cc=alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com \
--cc=joe.hershberger@ni.com \
--cc=rfried.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox