* [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
@ 2026-02-11 9:33 Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-11 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2026-02-12 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Stehlé
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2026-02-11 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Cc: Vincent Stehlé, Heinrich Schuchardt, Ilias Apalodimas,
Tom Rini, Jose Marinho
The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
should also be easier to extend in the future.
Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
---
lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
index 2bae93a94bd..9768b5ae824 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
@@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
#include <malloc.h>
static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
-static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
- EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
+
+static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
+ EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
+#endif
+};
/**
* efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
@@ -23,12 +27,11 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
*/
efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
{
- u16 num_entries = 0;
struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
efi_status_t ret;
size_t ecpt_size;
- ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
+ ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
+ sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
(void **)&ecpt);
@@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
return ret;
}
- if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
- guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
- &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
-
+ memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
- ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
+ ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
/* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-11 9:33 [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation Vincent Stehlé
@ 2026-02-11 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2026-02-11 11:47 ` Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-12 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Stehlé
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2026-02-11 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Stehlé
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt, Ilias Apalodimas, Tom Rini, Jose Marinho,
u-boot
On 2/11/26 10:33, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
> computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
> CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
>
> This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
> efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
> CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
>
> valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
> ./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
>
> Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
> should also be easier to extend in the future.
Thank you Vincent for this patch.
Maybe mention in the commit message that U-Boot should publish all
supported EBBR revisions.
>
> Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
> ---
> lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> index 2bae93a94bd..9768b5ae824 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
> #include <malloc.h>
>
> static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
> -static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> - EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
> +
> +static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
As profiles[] is not used outside efi_ecpt_register(), there is no need
to make it a static variable.
Otherwise looks good to me.
Best regards
Heinrich
> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
> + EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
> +#endif
> +};
>
> /**
> * efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
> @@ -23,12 +27,11 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> */
> efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> {
> - u16 num_entries = 0;
> struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
> efi_status_t ret;
> size_t ecpt_size;
>
> - ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
> + ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
> + sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
> ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
> (void **)&ecpt);
> @@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
> - guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
> - &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
> -
> + memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
> ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
> - ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
> + ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
>
> /* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
> ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-11 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2026-02-11 11:47 ` Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-11 11:50 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2026-02-11 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinrich Schuchardt
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt, Ilias Apalodimas, Tom Rini, Jose Marinho,
u-boot
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/11/26 10:33, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> > The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
> > computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
> > CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
> >
> > This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
> > efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
> > CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
> >
> > valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
> > ./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
> >
> > Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
> > should also be easier to extend in the future.
>
> Thank you Vincent for this patch.
Hi Heinrich,
Thanks for reviewing.
> Maybe mention in the commit message that U-Boot should publish all supported
> EBBR revisions.
Ok, will do.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
> > Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> > Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
> > ---
> > lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > index 2bae93a94bd..9768b5ae824 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
> > #include <malloc.h>
> > static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
> > -static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> > - EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
> > +
> > +static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
>
> As profiles[] is not used outside efi_ecpt_register(), there is no need to
> make it a static variable.
I am not sure why a "global" symbol would be better than a static one, but if
you like this solution we could make the profiles[] array extern.
Then I guess we should rename it with a much longer name to avoid namespace
"pollution":
const efi_guid_t efi_conformance_profiles[] = {
...
All the sizeof() and ARRAY_SIZE() would have to follow, too.
Alternatively, we could move the array declaration inside the
efi_ecpt_register() function completely:
efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
{
struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
efi_status_t ret;
size_t ecpt_size;
static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
#endif
};
...
This is still static here, but for storage duration not linkage. One advantage
is that the name would not have to change. I am not a big fan of the #if in
function scope, but if you prefer this solution this is fine as well.
Best regards,
Vincent.
>
> Otherwise looks good to me.
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
>
> > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
> > + EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
> > +#endif
> > +};
> > /**
> > * efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
> > @@ -23,12 +27,11 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> > */
> > efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> > {
> > - u16 num_entries = 0;
> > struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
> > efi_status_t ret;
> > size_t ecpt_size;
> > - ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
> > + ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
> > + sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
> > ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
> > (void **)&ecpt);
> > @@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > - if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
> > - guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
> > - &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
> > -
> > + memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
> > ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
> > - ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
> > + ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
> > /* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
> > ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-11 11:47 ` Vincent Stehlé
@ 2026-02-11 11:50 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2026-02-11 12:25 ` Vincent Stehlé
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2026-02-11 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinrich Schuchardt; +Cc: Ilias Apalodimas, Tom Rini, Jose Marinho, u-boot
On 2/11/26 12:47, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 2/11/26 10:33, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
>>> The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
>>> computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
>>> CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
>>>
>>> This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
>>> efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
>>> CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
>>>
>>> valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
>>> ./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
>>>
>>> Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
>>> should also be easier to extend in the future.
>>
>> Thank you Vincent for this patch.
>
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
>> Maybe mention in the commit message that U-Boot should publish all supported
>> EBBR revisions.
>
> Ok, will do.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>> Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
>>> index 2bae93a94bd..9768b5ae824 100644
>>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
>>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
>>> @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
>>> #include <malloc.h>
>>> static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
>>> -static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
>>> - EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
>>> +
>>> +static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
>>
>> As profiles[] is not used outside efi_ecpt_register(), there is no need to
>> make it a static variable.
>
> I am not sure why a "global" symbol would be better than a static one, but if
> you like this solution we could make the profiles[] array extern.
Sorry to not be clear. I wanted to suggest a local symbol.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
> Then I guess we should rename it with a much longer name to avoid namespace
> "pollution":
>
> const efi_guid_t efi_conformance_profiles[] = {
> ...
>
> All the sizeof() and ARRAY_SIZE() would have to follow, too.
>
> Alternatively, we could move the array declaration inside the
> efi_ecpt_register() function completely:
>
> efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> {
> struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
> efi_status_t ret;
> size_t ecpt_size;
>
> static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
> #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
> EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
> #endif
> };
>
> ...
>
> This is still static here, but for storage duration not linkage. One advantage
> is that the name would not have to change. I am not a big fan of the #if in
> function scope, but if you prefer this solution this is fine as well.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent.
>
>>
>> Otherwise looks good to me.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Heinrich
>>
>>
>>> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
>>> + EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
>>> +#endif
>>> +};
>>> /**
>>> * efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
>>> @@ -23,12 +27,11 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
>>> */
>>> efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
>>> {
>>> - u16 num_entries = 0;
>>> struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
>>> efi_status_t ret;
>>> size_t ecpt_size;
>>> - ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
>>> + ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
>>> + sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
>>> ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
>>> (void **)&ecpt);
>>> @@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> - if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
>>> - guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
>>> - &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
>>> -
>>> + memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
>>> ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
>>> - ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
>>> + ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
>>> /* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
>>> ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-11 11:50 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2026-02-11 12:25 ` Vincent Stehlé
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2026-02-11 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinrich Schuchardt
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt, Ilias Apalodimas, Tom Rini, Jose Marinho,
u-boot
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:50:38PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/11/26 12:47, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 2/11/26 10:33, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
(snip)
> > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > > > index 2bae93a94bd..9768b5ae824 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> > > > @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
> > > > #include <malloc.h>
> > > > static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
> > > > -static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> > > > - EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
> > > > +
> > > > +static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
> > >
> > > As profiles[] is not used outside efi_ecpt_register(), there is no need to
> > > make it a static variable.
> >
> > I am not sure why a "global" symbol would be better than a static one, but if
> > you like this solution we could make the profiles[] array extern.
>
> Sorry to not be clear. I wanted to suggest a local symbol.
Hi Heinrich,
The profiles[] array is "local" to the efi_conformance.c file already as it has
internal linkage, thanks to the static specifier. Is this the symbol name you
would like to prefix maybe?
static const efi_guid_t efi_conformance_profiles[] = {
...
Best regards,
Vincent.
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-11 9:33 [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-11 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2026-02-12 14:40 ` Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-15 7:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2026-02-12 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Cc: Vincent Stehlé, Heinrich Schuchardt, Ilias Apalodimas,
Tom Rini, Jose Marinho
The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
should also be easier to extend in the future as U-Boot should publish the
GUIDs for all supported EBBR revisions.
Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
Suggested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
---
Changes for v2:
- Mention in the commit message that U-Boot should publish all supported
EBBR GUIDs (suggested by Heinrich)
- Move the array declaration into the function (suggested by Heinrich)
lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
index 2bae93a94bd..2d31800ccb8 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
#include <malloc.h>
static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
-static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
- EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
/**
* efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
@@ -23,12 +21,17 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
*/
efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
{
- u16 num_entries = 0;
struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
efi_status_t ret;
size_t ecpt_size;
- ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
+ static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
+ #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
+ EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
+ #endif
+ };
+
+ ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
+ sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
(void **)&ecpt);
@@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
return ret;
}
- if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
- guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
- &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
-
+ memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
- ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
+ ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
/* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation
2026-02-12 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Stehlé
@ 2026-02-15 7:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2026-02-15 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Stehlé; +Cc: Ilias Apalodimas, Tom Rini, Jose Marinho, u-boot
On 2/12/26 15:40, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> The size of the memory allocated for the EFI Conformance Profiles Table is
> computed with `num_entries' always equal to zero, which is incorrect when
> CONFIG_EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE is enabled.
>
> This can be verified by allocating the ECPT memory with malloc() instead of
> efi_allocate_pool(), building u-boot with sandbox_defconfig and
> CONFIG_VALGRIND=y, and by finally running the following command:
>
> valgrind --suppressions=scripts/u-boot.supp \
> ./u-boot -T -c 'efidebug tables'
>
> Fix this by using an array of the supported profiles GUIDs instead, which
> should also be easier to extend in the future as U-Boot should publish the
> GUIDs for all supported EBBR revisions.
>
> Fixes: 6b92c1735205 ("efi: Create ECPT table")
> Suggested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>0
> Cc: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> ---
>
>
> Changes for v2:
> - Mention in the commit message that U-Boot should publish all supported
> EBBR GUIDs (suggested by Heinrich)
> - Move the array declaration into the function (suggested by Heinrich)
>
>
> lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> index 2bae93a94bd..2d31800ccb8 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c
> @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
> #include <malloc.h>
>
> static const efi_guid_t efi_ecpt_guid = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_GUID;
> -static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> - EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID;
>
> /**
> * efi_ecpt_register() - Install the ECPT system table.
> @@ -23,12 +21,17 @@ static const efi_guid_t efi_ebbr_2_1_guid =
> */
> efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> {
> - u16 num_entries = 0;
> struct efi_conformance_profiles_table *ecpt;
> efi_status_t ret;
> size_t ecpt_size;
>
> - ecpt_size = num_entries * sizeof(efi_guid_t)
> + static const efi_guid_t profiles[] = {
> + #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE)
> + EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILE_EBBR_2_1_GUID,
> + #endif
> + };
> +
> + ecpt_size = sizeof(profiles)
> + sizeof(struct efi_conformance_profiles_table);
> ret = efi_allocate_pool(EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA, ecpt_size,
> (void **)&ecpt);
> @@ -39,12 +42,9 @@ efi_status_t efi_ecpt_register(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_EBBR_2_1_CONFORMANCE))
> - guidcpy(&ecpt->conformance_profiles[num_entries++],
> - &efi_ebbr_2_1_guid);
> -
> + memcpy(ecpt->conformance_profiles, profiles, sizeof(profiles));
> ecpt->version = EFI_CONFORMANCE_PROFILES_TABLE_VERSION;
> - ecpt->number_of_profiles = num_entries;
> + ecpt->number_of_profiles = ARRAY_SIZE(profiles);
>
> /* Install the ECPT in the system configuration table. */
> ret = efi_install_configuration_table(&efi_ecpt_guid, (void *)ecpt);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-15 7:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-11 9:33 [PATCH] efi_loader: fix ecpt size computation Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-11 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2026-02-11 11:47 ` Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-11 11:50 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2026-02-11 12:25 ` Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-12 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Stehlé
2026-02-15 7:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox